FCC Web Documents citing 0.121

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2008 08 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2899A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2899A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2899A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ä Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Editorial Amendment of Part 0 of the ) Commission's Rules ) ) ORDER Adopted: September 23, 2003 Released: September 24, 2003 By the Managing Director: In this Order, we amend Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission's protected field installations where radio spectrum monitoring operations are conducted. Specifically, this Order adds the geographical coordinates of the Commission's new Kenai, Alaska monitoring facility to the list of protected field installations set forth in Section 0.121(b). These locations are protected from harmful radio frequency interference
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2923A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2923A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2923A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ä Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Editorial Amendment of Part 0 of the ) Commission's Rules ) ) ORDER Adopted: September 8, 2004 Released: September 13, 2004 By the Managing Director: In this Order, we amend Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission's protected field installations where radio spectrum monitoring operations are conducted. Specifically, this Order deletes the geographical coordinates of the Commission's Anchorage, Alaska monitoring facility from the list of protected field installations set forth in Section 0.121(b). These locations are protected from harmful radio frequency interference to
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202012A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202012A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-202012A1.txt
  • * * (b) A station within 1600 m (1 mile) of an FCC monitoring facility must protect that facility from harmful interference. Failure to do so could result in imposition of operating restrictions upon the amateur station by a District Director pursuant to § 97.121 of this part. Geographical coordinates of the facilities that require protection are listed in § 0.121(c) of this chapter. * * * (2) If the routine environmental evaluation indicates that the RF electromagnetic fields could exceed the limits contained in § 1.1310 of this chapter in accessible areas, the licensee must take action to prevent human exposure to such RF electromagnetic fields. Further information on evaluating compliance with these limits can be found in the FCC's
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.txt
  • of The 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review, Report, 16 FCC Rcd 1207, 1231-1232 (2001) (``2000 Biennial Review Report''). Id., citing Federal Communications Commission Biennial Regulatory Review 2000, CC Dkt. No. 00-175, Updated Staff Report (rel. Jan. 17, 2001) (``Updated Staff Report''), Appendix IV: Rule Part Analysis at 9. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. Id. Id., § 1.924(a). Id., § 1.924(b). Id., §§ 0.121, 1.924(c). Id., § 1.924(d). We exclude section 1.924(e), 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(e), concerning Government Satellite Earth Stations located in the Denver, Colorado and Washington, D.C. areas, from consideration in this proceeding, given the nature of the protected operations. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking likewise does not propose any changes to section 1.924(f), 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(f), which limits operations in
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-23A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-23A1.pdf http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-23A1.txt
  • Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, May 2003 Edition, Section 8.3.9. In this regard, we clarify references in certain service specific rules to avoid confusion regarding the term ``quiet zone.'' See Appendix A. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.121, 1.924(c). These field offices are located in Allegan, Michigan; Anchorage, Alaska; Belfast, Maine; Canandaigua, New York; Douglas, Arizona; Ferndale, Washington; Grand Island, Nebraska; Kingsville, Texas; Laurel, Maryland; Livermore, California; Powder Springs, Georgia; Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico; Vero Beach, Florida; and Waipahu, Hawaii. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(d). In the NPRM, the Commission noted that it was excluding section 1.924(e), 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2899A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2899A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2899A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ä Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Editorial Amendment of Part 0 of the ) Commission's Rules ) ) ORDER Adopted: September 23, 2003 Released: September 24, 2003 By the Managing Director: In this Order, we amend Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission's protected field installations where radio spectrum monitoring operations are conducted. Specifically, this Order adds the geographical coordinates of the Commission's new Kenai, Alaska monitoring facility to the list of protected field installations set forth in Section 0.121(b). These locations are protected from harmful radio frequency interference
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2923A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2923A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2923A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ä Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Editorial Amendment of Part 0 of the ) Commission's Rules ) ) ORDER Adopted: September 8, 2004 Released: September 13, 2004 By the Managing Director: In this Order, we amend Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission's protected field installations where radio spectrum monitoring operations are conducted. Specifically, this Order deletes the geographical coordinates of the Commission's Anchorage, Alaska monitoring facility from the list of protected field installations set forth in Section 0.121(b). These locations are protected from harmful radio frequency interference to
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-646A1.txt
  • rules. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Steven A. Broeckaert Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau ATTACHMENT A CSR 5940-E COMMUNITIES AT ISSUE Community CUIDs in Franchise 2000 Census HH Zip Codes HH Allocation DBS Subs/ Zip Codes* DBS Subs Allocated CPR** Aberdeen NC0043 1,526 18,345 0.083 2886 240 15.73% Apex NC0067 7,397 50, 868 0.154 12,092 2105 28.45% Carrboro NC0130 7,570 62,376 0.121 13,636 1655 21.86% NC0649 Chapel Hill NC0234 withdrawn Chatham NC0468 16,364 85,781 0.187 26,670 5104 31.19% (Chatham North East) NC0997 Clayton NC0065 2,768 27,814 0.100 9,372 933 33.70% Durham NC0343 13,118 131,297 0.100 19,741 1972 15.04% NC0650 Fairmont NC0218 1,078 18,872 0.057 4,748 271 25.16% Farmville NC0322 1,839 4,052 0.454 1,021 463 25.20% Fuquay-Varina NC0066 3,122 79,510 0.039 17,105 672
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 0.000 425213 C N SOUTHWESTERN BELL-MO Southwestern Bell 710,785,345 2,478,864 286.74 0 0.000 429784 C N CENTURYTEL-MO CEN CenturyTel, Inc. 31,425,665 89,301 351.91 1,056,605 0.093 429785 C R CENTURYTEL-MO BELLE CenturyTel, Inc. 2,268,802 4,482 506.20 501,048 0.044 429786 C R CENTURYTEL-MO SOUTH CenturyTel, Inc. 9,122,975 25,687 355.16 199,399 0.018 429787 C N CENTURYTEL-MO SW CenturyTel, Inc. 87,763,878 221,874 395.56 1,372,357 0.121 3 - 243 Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Data for 2003 by Study Area Study Area Code TypeStatusStudy Area Name Holding Company Name Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement Number of Loops Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop Projected High- Cost Loop Support Payments for 2005 Percent of Total $ $ $ % TOTAL: MONTANA 199,689,498 523,879 381.17 26,593,080 2.342 482235 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 0.000 425213 C N SOUTHWESTERN BELL-MO Southwestern Bell 710,785,345 2,478,864 286.74 0 0.000 429784 C N CENTURYTEL-MO CEN CenturyTel, Inc. 31,425,665 89,301 351.91 1,056,605 0.093 429785 C R CENTURYTEL-MO BELLE CenturyTel, Inc. 2,268,802 4,482 506.20 501,048 0.044 429786 C R CENTURYTEL-MO SOUTH CenturyTel, Inc. 9,122,975 25,687 355.16 199,399 0.018 429787 C N CENTURYTEL-MO SW CenturyTel, Inc. 87,763,878 221,874 395.56 1,372,357 0.121 3 - 243 Table 3.31 High-Cost Loop Support Data for 2003 by Study Area Study Area Code TypeStatusStudy Area Name Holding Company Name Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement Number of Loops Unseparated NTS Revenue Requirement per Loop Projected High- Cost Loop Support Payments for 2005 Percent of Total $ $ $ % TOTAL: MONTANA 199,689,498 523,879 381.17 26,593,080 2.342 482235 C
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • RIVER MUT-MO Grand River Mutual Tel. Corp. 8,646,413 15,391 561.78 2,081,877 0.185 421890 C R GREEN HILLS TEL CORP 3,895,255 3,716 1,048.24 1,858,412 0.165 421893 A R CHOCTAW TELEPHONE CO Townes Telecommunications 301,284 631 477.47 45,493 0.004 421900 A R KLM TEL CO RBJ Corporation 839,242 1,585 529.49 176,012 0.016 421901 C R KINGDOM TELEPHONE CO 4,178,715 6,208 673.12 1,358,129 0.121 421908 C R LE-RU TELEPHONE CO 2,654,515 1,647 1,611.73 1,519,734 0.135 421912 C R MCDONALD COUNTY TEL 3,039,769 4,211 721.86 1,075,177 0.096 421914 C R MARK TWAIN RURAL TEL 3,953,221 4,537 871.33 1,667,022 0.148 421917 C R MID-MISSOURI TEL CO CEA Capital 4,647,522 4,441 1,046.50 2,215,197 0.197 421920 C R MILLER TEL CO - MO TelAtlantic Communications, Inc. 865,377 1,080
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • RIVER MUT-MO Grand River Mutual Tel. Corp. 8,646,413 15,391 561.78 2,081,877 0.185 421890 C R GREEN HILLS TEL CORP 3,895,255 3,716 1,048.24 1,858,412 0.165 421893 A R CHOCTAW TELEPHONE CO Townes Telecommunications 301,284 631 477.47 45,493 0.004 421900 A R KLM TEL CO RBJ Corporation 839,242 1,585 529.49 176,012 0.016 421901 C R KINGDOM TELEPHONE CO 4,178,715 6,208 673.12 1,358,129 0.121 421908 C R LE-RU TELEPHONE CO 2,654,515 1,647 1,611.73 1,519,734 0.135 421912 C R MCDONALD COUNTY TEL 3,039,769 4,211 721.86 1,075,177 0.096 421914 C R MARK TWAIN RURAL TEL 3,953,221 4,537 871.33 1,667,022 0.148 421917 C R MID-MISSOURI TEL CO CEA Capital 4,647,522 4,441 1,046.50 2,215,197 0.197 421920 C R MILLER TEL CO - MO TelAtlantic Communications, Inc. 865,377 1,080
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-272545A2.txt
  • 0.1 264,354,761 8.3 0.015.231.5 44.9 Greenland $298,948 0.3 0.083.3 6.0 10.4 $2,204 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $70 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 652,750 0.4 0.077.110.5 12.0 Iceland $3,001,848 3.9 0.024.722.6 48.8 $286,192 0.0 0.018.622.4 59.0 $633 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 32,771,878 2.5 0.027.525.0 45.0 Ireland $44,072,784 6.6 0.122.225.5 45.6 $5,536,092 2.9 0.029.814.8 52.5 $4,134,615 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 477,165,748 6.8 0.121.923.9 47.4 Italy $132,786,542 2.8 0.031.114.3 51.7 $8,640,532 0.8 0.037.519.9 41.8 $12,753,395 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1,258,138,243 2.7 0.032.316.3 48.7 Liechtenstein $2,777,434 0.5 2.625.513.6 57.9 $6,265 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 5,929,750 1.0 3.128.124.7 43.1 Luxembourg $3,483,601 0.8 0.020.919.6 58.7 $164,671 0.6 0.023.119.8 56.5 $57,897 98.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 35,632,116 1.6 0.012.232.8 53.4 Malta $1,010,356
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • R BLEDSOE TEL COOP 4,763,296 12,584 378.52 0 0.000 290557 C R CENTURY-CLAIBORNE CenturyTel, Inc. 5,824,390 9,543 610.33 1,496,321 0.134 290559 A R CONCORD TEL EXCHANGE Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 6,855,394 22,541 304.13 0 0.000 290561 C R CROCKETT TEL CO Telephone Electronics Corporation 2,200,348 4,129 532.90 407,637 0.036 290562 C R DEKALB TEL COOP 9,796,238 20,018 489.37 1,349,990 0.121 290565 A R HIGHLAND TEL COOP-TN 10,010,976 27,203 368.01 0 0.000 290566 C R HUMPHREY'S COUNTY Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 916,714 1,852 494.99 131,662 0.012 290567 C R UNITED INTER-MT-TN Embarq Corporation 63,865,361 249,638 255.83 0 0.000 290570 A R LORETTO TEL CO 2,637,542 5,890 447.80 238,064 0.021 290571 C R MILLINGTON TEL CO 10,204,707 27,014 377.76 0 0.000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • R BLEDSOE TEL COOP 4,763,296 12,584 378.52 0 0.000 290557 C R CENTURY-CLAIBORNE CenturyTel, Inc. 5,824,390 9,543 610.33 1,496,321 0.134 290559 A R CONCORD TEL EXCHANGE Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 6,855,394 22,541 304.13 0 0.000 290561 C R CROCKETT TEL CO Telephone Electronics Corporation 2,200,348 4,129 532.90 407,637 0.036 290562 C R DEKALB TEL COOP 9,796,238 20,018 489.37 1,349,990 0.121 290565 A R HIGHLAND TEL COOP-TN 10,010,976 27,203 368.01 0 0.000 290566 C R HUMPHREY'S COUNTY Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. 916,714 1,852 494.99 131,662 0.012 290567 C R UNITED INTER-MT-TN Embarq Corporation 63,865,361 249,638 255.83 0 0.000 290570 A R LORETTO TEL CO 2,637,542 5,890 447.80 238,064 0.021 290571 C R MILLINGTON TEL CO 10,204,707 27,014 377.76 0 0.000
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-333A1.txt
  • of The 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review, Report, 16 FCC Rcd 1207, 1231-1232 (2001) (``2000 Biennial Review Report''). Id., citing Federal Communications Commission Biennial Regulatory Review 2000, CC Dkt. No. 00-175, Updated Staff Report (rel. Jan. 17, 2001) (``Updated Staff Report''), Appendix IV: Rule Part Analysis at 9. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. Id. Id., § 1.924(a). Id., § 1.924(b). Id., §§ 0.121, 1.924(c). Id., § 1.924(d). We exclude section 1.924(e), 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(e), concerning Government Satellite Earth Stations located in the Denver, Colorado and Washington, D.C. areas, from consideration in this proceeding, given the nature of the protected operations. This Notice of Proposed Rulemaking likewise does not propose any changes to section 1.924(f), 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(f), which limits operations in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-10A1.txt
  • its own initiative or upon request of another Bureau or Office. * * * * * (19) Provide information regarding pending complaints, compliance with relevant requirements and the complaint process, where appropriate and to the extent the information is not available from the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau or other Bureaus and Offices. * * * * * 12. Section 0.121 is amended to read as follows: § 0.121 Location of field installations. (a) Field offices are located throughout the United States. For the address and phone number of the closest office contact the Enforcement Bureau or see the U.S. Government Manual. (b) Protected field offices are located at the following geographical coordinates (coordinates are referenced to North American Datum 1983
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-257A1.txt
  • the Notice, the Commission proposed updating a number of cross-references in Part 25 rules. In addition to those proposals, we invite comment on revising Section 25.161(b) so that the reference to the license renewal requirements is "Section 25.121(e) rather than "Section 25.120(e)." We also seek comment on revising Section 25.203(g)(1) so that the reference of FCC monitoring stations is "Section 0.121(b)" rather than "Section 0.121(c)." VII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS In this Further Notice, we propose to reduce the minimum antenna size for routine processing of C-band earth stations to 3.7 meters. We also propose to begin the antenna gain envelope at 3° off-axis outside the GSO orbital plane for Ku-band earth stations, and to increase the antenna gain pattern limits in
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-198A1.txt
  • (hills or mountain slopes) and commonly employ electrical antenna beam tilt or combinations of mechanical and electrical tilt to maximize their signal down into the served communities. To illustrate the concern, based on the Table 8 antenna pattern, an LPTV station in the UHF band with a maximum effective radiated power of 10 kilowatts (kW) would have only 121 watts (0.121 kW) assumed downward power toward locations more than 6 degrees below the horizontal plane from the antenna. Applying the full-service antenna assumption could result in areas close to the LPTV or TV translator stations' towers that would not be predicted to be served by those stations. In many cases, stations have chosen transmitter sites situated at a high elevation with
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-97A1.txt
  • 99.823 0.177 99.827 0.173 0.020 0.004 12.516 Indianapolis 99.874 0.126 99.855 0.145 99.862 0.138 0.019 0.007 15.421 Sacramento 99.835 0.165 99.816 0.184 99.819 0.181 0.019 0.003 11.658 Dallas 99.791 0.209 99.773 0.227 99.770 0.230 0.018 (0.003) 8.708 Pittsburgh 99.881 0.120 99.863 0.137 99.869 0.131 0.018 0.006 14.728 San Francisco 99.860 0.140 99.844 0.156 99.846 0.154 0.016 0.002 11.748 Portland 99.879 0.121 99.864 0.136 99.867 0.133 0.015 0.003 12.541 Cincinnati 99.857 0.144 99.843 0.157 99.842 0.158 0.014 (0.001) 9.477 Columbus 99.865 0.135 99.852 0.148 99.852 0.148 0.013 (0.001) 9.651 Cleveland 99.880 0.120 99.868 0.132 99.868 0.132 0.012 0.000 9.718 Los Angeles 99.922 0.078 99.911 0.089 99.914 0.086 0.011 0.004 14.781 Kansas City 99.885 0.115 99.875 0.125 99.874 0.126 0.011 (0.001) 9.329 San
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-23A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-23A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-23A1.txt
  • Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, May 2003 Edition, Section 8.3.9. In this regard, we clarify references in certain service specific rules to avoid confusion regarding the term ``quiet zone.'' See Appendix A. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924. Id. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(a). 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(b). 47 C.F.R. §§ 0.121, 1.924(c). These field offices are located in Allegan, Michigan; Anchorage, Alaska; Belfast, Maine; Canandaigua, New York; Douglas, Arizona; Ferndale, Washington; Grand Island, Nebraska; Kingsville, Texas; Laurel, Maryland; Livermore, California; Powder Springs, Georgia; Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico; Vero Beach, Florida; and Waipahu, Hawaii. 47 C.F.R. § 1.924(d). In the NPRM, the Commission noted that it was excluding section 1.924(e), 47 C.F.R.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-245A1.txt
  • consult in good faith to ensure that no harmful interference is caused to licensed operations and that any constraints on BPL deployments are minimized to those necessary to avoid harmful interference. For frequencies in the 1.7-30 MHz frequency range, the areas within 4 km of facilities located at the following coordinates: the Commission's protected field offices listed in 47 C.F.R. §0.121, the point-of-contact for which is specified in that section; (ii) the aeronautical stations listed in Tables 3a and 3b; (iii) the land stations listed in Tables 4 and 5; For frequencies in the 1.7-38.25 MHz frequency range, the areas within 4 km of facilities located at the coordinates specified for radio astronomy facilities in 47 C.F.R. § 2.106, Note US
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-05-63A1.txt
  • and we adopt them as they were proposed in Appendix B of the Notice. In addition, in the Further Notice, the Commission invited comment on revising Section 25.161(b) so that the reference to the license renewal requirements is "Section 25.121(e) rather than "Section 25.120(e)." It also proposed revising Section 25.203(g)(1) so that the reference to FCC monitoring stations is "Section 0.121(b)" rather than "Section 0.121(c)." SIA supports correcting these cross-references. Accordingly, we adopt these rule revisions as proposed. The Commission also invited commenters to make additional proposals and suggestions for streamlining our rules. We consider those proposals below. 1. Extension of ALSAT Authority Loral recommends extending ALSAT authority to all routinely authorized earth stations currently in operation. "ALSAT" authority allows the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.pdf http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.txt http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/fo9750.wp
  • possible interference to FCC monitoring activities. (1) WCS licensees planning to construct and operate a new or modified WCS station at a permanent fixed location in the vicinity of an FCC protected field office are advised to give consideration to the need to avoid interfering with the monitoring activities of that office. FCC protected field offices are listed in section 0.121 of this chapter. (2) Applications for stations (except mobile stations) that could produce on any channel a direct wave fundamental field strength of greater than 10 mV/m (-65.8 dBW/m power flux density 2 assuming a free space characteristic impedance of 120 ) in the authorized bandwidth at the protected field office must be examined by WCS licensees to determine the
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/14/releases/wcsbip.pdf
  • or modified WCS station at a permanent office are advised to give consideration to the need to fixed location in the vicinity of Boulder County, Colorado avoid interfering with the monitoring activities of that are advised to give consideration, prior to filing office. FCC protected field offices are listed in applications, to the need to protect the Table Mountain section 0.121 of this chapter. Radio Receiving Zone from interference. To prevent degradation of the present ambient radio signal level at (2) Applications for stations (except mobile stations) that the site, the U.S. Department of Commerce seeks to could produce on any channel a direct wave fundamental ensure that the field strengths of any radiated signals field strength of greater than 10
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/conferences/combin2000/releases/98540193.pdf
  • each environment we selected the average size of the packages that had superadditive values assigned to bidders: the greater the average number of licenses in a package, the greater the overlap. The effects of the three properties above are included in the ANOVA table that follows: Table 4.1.2c ANOVA Efficiency: Superadditive Environment Variable F-statistic p-value Flexible 10.362 0.002 Unequal 2.453 0.121 Environment (H, M, L) 2.467 0.091 Number of Bidders 1.406 0.250 Overlap 3.592 0.005 CE Exists 0.021 0.885 Flexible Unequal 0.578 0.449 Environment Flexible Unequal 0.138 0.871 Result 3: The Flexible treatment has a positive and statistically significant effect on assignment efficiency. Overlap has a statistically significant negative effect on efficiency. All other variables are statistically insignificant. 18 It was
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/4361-97.pdf
  • THE UNITED STATES (BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN) IN THE UNITED STATES Billed Percent share by carrier Receipts Percent share by carrier Receipts Percent share by carrier Total Percent share by carrier revenues 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other from PTT 1 2 3 4 Other Minutes 1 2 3 4 Other Andorra $234,36249.823.6 5.2 0.121.3 $543 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $0 299,672 0.423.9 5.4 0.369.9 Austria $39,990,02564.825.7 8.4 0.4 0.7 $4,708,00643.640.415.8 0.0 0.1 $1,339,632100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 83,840,67948.536.613.2 0.6 1.1 Belgium $86,458,00559.622.112.4 3.5 2.5 $10,343,96346.527.312.610.0 3.6 $3,427,230 8.5 7.9 2.3 0.081.3 173,272,93745.123.015.0 9.1 7.9 Cyprus $9,534,85256.225.8 8.1 0.1 9.8 $2,479,90056.420.822.3 0.0 0.5 $339,53843.948.9 7.2 0.0 0.0 13,930,25850.120.715.8 0.113.3 Denmark $45,095,78656.023.510.5 3.8 6.2 $4,188,49144.625.022.7 7.7
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd98.pdf
  • Ckt Cost per SystemYear Techology ($ million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030 TAT-12 1996 Fiber Optic 378.0 60,480.0 60,480.0 1,080 0.012 TAT-13 1996 Fiber Optic 378.0 60,480.0 60,480.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itltrd99.pdf
  • million) Circuits Circuits 1/ 2/ Minute 3/ TAT-1 1956 Coax Cable $49.6 44.5 40.1 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959 Coax Cable 42.7 49.0 44.1 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963 Coax Cable 50.6 87.5 78.8 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965 Coax Cable 50.4 69.0 62.1 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970 Coax Cable 70.4 720.0 648.0 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976 Coax Cable 197.0 4,000.0 3,200.0 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983 Coax Cable 180.0 4,246.0 3,821.4 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360.0 7,560.0 6,048.0 10,285 0.117 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406.0 15,120.0 10,584.0 6,628 0.076 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,857 0.033 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280.0 22,680.0 18,144.0 2,667 0.030 TAT-12 1996 Fiber Optic 378.0 60,480.0 60,480.0 1,080 0.012 TAT-13 1996 Fiber Optic 378.0 60,480.0
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Intl/itrnd00.pdf
  • Year Techology ($ Million)as Planned 12/Planned 12/ Planned Circuit 13/Minute 14/ Trans-Atlantic Operational TAT-1 1956Coax Cable $50 45 40 $213,996 $2.443 TAT-2 1959Coax Cable 43 49 44 167,308 1.910 TAT-3 1963Coax Cable 51 88 79 111,027 1.267 TAT-4 1965Coax Cable 50 69 62 140,238 1.601 TAT-5 1970Coax Cable 70 720 648 18,773 0.214 TAT-6 1976Coax Cable 197 4,000 3,200 10,638 0.121 TAT-7 1983Coax Cable 180 4,246 3,821 8,139 0.093 TAT-8 1988 Fiber Optic 360 7,560 6,048 10,285 0.117 PTAT-1 1989 Fiber Optic 400 17,010 17,010 4,063 0.046 TAT-9 1992 Fiber Optic 406 15,120 15,120 4,640 0.053 TAT-10 1992 Fiber Optic 300 22,680 15,120 3,428 0.039 TAT-11 1993 Fiber Optic 280 22,680 15,120 3,200 0.037 TAT-12/13 1996 Fiber Optic 756 60,480 60,480
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • 0.000 361482 A R SHERBURNE CTY RURAL 3,916,772 14,491 270.29 0 0.000 361483 C R SLEEPY EYE TEL CO Alliance Telecomm. 2,573,194 6,412 401.31 392,513 0.037 361485 A R SPRING GROVE COOP 534,164 1,386 385.40 70,430 0.007 361487 A R STARBUCK TEL CO 579,822 1,775 326.66 22,426 0.002 361491 C R TWIN VALLEY-ULEN TEL Arvig Enterprises 2,836,318 3,569 794.71 1,271,511 0.121 361494 A R UPSALA COOP TEL ASSN 446,607 1,251 357.00 40,477 0.004 361495 A R VALLEY TEL CO - MN Park Region Mutual 368,692 868 424.76 68,401 0.006 361499 A R CROSSLAKE TEL CO 759,937 2,762 275.14 0 0.000 361500 A R NORTHERN TEL CO - MN 25,434 41 620.33 9,245 0.001 361501 C R WEST CENTRAL TEL 2,894,227 4,428
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 401720C R CENTURYTEL-REDFIELD CenturyTel, Inc. 1,127,785 2,051 549.87 368,691 0.040 401721A R RICE BELT TEL CO 427,116 1,104 386.88 63,715 0.007 401722A R E RITTER TEL CO E. Ritter Communications, Inc. 1,854,629 5,207 356.18 196,603 0.021 401724C R SW ARKANSAS TEL COOP 3,717,553 6,181 601.45 1,350,218 0.147 401726C R TRI-COUNTY TEL CO-AR E. Ritter Communications, Inc. 3,623,374 6,911 524.29 1,109,744 0.121 401727C R CENTURYTEL-SOUTH AR CenturyTel, Inc. 1,290,191 1,344 959.96 654,970 0.071 401729C R WALNUT HILL TEL CO Townes Telecommunications 5,511,793 5,442 1,012.82 2,867,793 0.312 401730C R GTE ARKANSAS INC. GTE Corporation 35,949,322 110,559 325.16 1,945,233 0.212 401733C R YELCOT TEL CO INC 1,833,011 3,982 460.32 448,369 0.049 401734C R YELL COUNTY TEL CO 2,627,869 5,739 457.90 635,790 0.069 401790C R
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • Inc. 4,762,203 18,451 258.10 0 0.000 361482A R SHERBURNE CTY RURAL 3,682,449 13,695 268.89 0 0.000 361483C R SLEEPY EYE TEL CO Ollig Utilities 2,027,118 6,529 310.48 52,282 0.005 361485A R SPRING GROVE COOP 500,205 1,374 364.05 58,846 0.006 361487A R STARBUCK TEL CO 556,284 1,759 316.25 20,683 0.002 361491C R TWIN VALLEY-ULEN TEL Arvig Enterprises 2,672,688 3,543 754.36 1,180,085 0.121 361494A R UPSALA COOP TEL ASSN 370,194 1,065 347.60 34,224 0.004 361495A R VALLEY TEL CO - MN Park Region Mutual Tel. Co. 343,375 867 396.05 55,785 0.006 361499A R CROSSLAKE TEL CO 756,827 2,754 274.81 0 0.000 361500A R NORTHERN TEL CO - MN 24,667 40 616.67 9,192 0.001 361501C R WEST CENTRAL TEL 2,770,600 4,449 622.75 1,042,702 0.107
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/99socc.pdf
  • Total Number of Number of U.S. Carrier IMTS Resale Carrier Messages Minutes Revenue Revenue Connect America Communications, Inc. 28,959 192,708 264,692 0.005% Connecticut Telephone & Communication Systems, Inc. (CTCS) 15,489 65,069 39,390 0.001 Convergent Communications Services, Inc. 95,035 1,140,421 262,748 0.005 Cox Communications, Inc. 60,799 1,215,981 379,944 0.008 Crosslink Long Distance 466 1,696 3,733 0.000 CruisePhone Inc. 698,629 2,095,889 5,890,189 0.121 Crystal Communications, Inc. 7,728 70,277 101,754 0.002 CT Communications, Inc. CTC Long Distance Services, Inc. 106,894 1,089,705 609,878 0.013 CTC Communications Corporation 636,002 5,088,017 4,019,534 0.082 D&E/Omnipoint Wireless Joint Venture, L.P. d/b/a PCS One 2,213 13,974 22,595 0.000 D&E Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. d/b/a D and E Long Distance 16,661 141,951 193,507 0.004 Dialink Corporation 209,757 750,877 414,033 0.008
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Miscellaneous/Orders/1997/fcc97050.wp
  • possible interference to FCC monitoring activities. (1) WCS licensees planning to construct and operate a new or modified WCS station at a permanent fixed location in the vicinity of an FCC protected field office are advised to give consideration to the need to avoid interfering with the monitoring activities of that office. FCC protected field offices are listed in section 0.121 of this chapter. (2) Applications for stations (except mobile stations) that could produce on any channel a direct wave fundamental field strength of greater than 10 mV/m (-65.8 dBW/m power flux density 2 assuming a free space characteristic impedance of 120B S) in the authorized bandwidth at the protected field office must be examined by WCS licensees to determine the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Notices/1998/fcc98025.wp
  • follows: Sec. 97.13 Restrictions on station location. (a) Before placing an amateur station on land of environmental importance or that is significant in American history, architecture or culture, the licensee may be required to take certain actions prescribed by Sections 1.1305-1.1319 of this chapter. (b) * * *. Geographical coordinates of the facilities that require protection are listed in Section 0.121(c) of this chapter. (c) * * * * * * (2) * * *. Further information on evaluating compliance with these limits can be found in the OET Bulletin Number 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields." 160. Section 97.15 is amended by revising paragraph (a), (b) and (d) to read as follows:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1996/fcc96051.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1996/fcc96051.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1996/fcc96051.wp
  • tomodifyanexistingstationinamannerwhichwouldchangeeitherthefrequency,power, antennaheightordirectivity,orlocationofsuchastationwithintheareaboarded by 39E15' N.onthenorth,78E30'W.ontheeast,37E30'N.onthesouth,and80E30'W.onthewest mustatthetimeoffilingsuchapplicationwiththeCommission,simultaneouslynotifythe Director,NationalRadioAstronomyObservatory,PostOfficeBoxNo.2,GreenBank,W. Va.24944,inwriting,ofthetechnicalparticularsoftheproposedstation.Suchnotification mustincludethegeographicalcoordinatesoftheantenna,antennaheight,antennadirectivity ifany,proposedfrequency,typeofemissionandpower.Inaddition,theapplicantmust indicateinhisapplicationtotheCommissionthedatenotificationwasmadetothe Observatory.Afterreceiptofsuchapplications,theCommissionwillallowaperiodof twenty(20)daysforcommentsorobjectionsinresponsetothenotificationsindicated.Ifan objectiontotheproposedoperationisreceivedduringthe20-dayperiodfromtheNational RadioAstronomyObservatoryforitselforonbehalfoftheNavalRadioResearch Observatory,theCommissionwillconsiderallaspectsoftheproblemandtakewhatever actionisdeemedappropriate. (b)ProtectionforTableMountainRadioReceivingZone,BoulderCounty,Colorado. ApplicantsforastationauthorizationtooperateinthevicinityofBoulderCounty,Colorado underthispartareadvisedtogivedueconsideration,priortofilingapplications,totheneedto protecttheTableMountainRadioReceivingZonefromharmfulinterference.Thesearethe researchlaboratoriesoftheDepartmentofCommerce,BoulderCounty,Colorado.Toprevent degradationofthepresentambientradiosignallevelatthesite,theDepartmentofCommerce seekstoensurethatthefieldstrengthsofanyradiatedsignals(excludingreflectedsignals) receivedonthis1800acresite(inthevicinityofcoordinates40E07'50"N.Latitude,105E14' 40"W.Longitude),resultingfromnewassignmentsorfromthemodificationorrelocationof existingfacilitiesdonotexceed1mV/mintheauthorizedbandwidthofservice.(Afield strengthof1mV/misequivalenttoapowerfluxdensityof85.8dBW/Massuminga 2 free-spacecharacteristicimpedanceof376.7ohms.) (1) Advanceconsultationisrecommendedparticularlyforthoseapplicantswhohave noreliabledatawhichindicateswhetherthefieldstrengthorpowerfluxdensityfigureswould beexceededbytheirproposedradiofacilities.Insuchinstances,thefollowingisasuggested guidefordeterminingwhethercoordinationisrecommended: (i)Allstationswithin2.4km; (ii)Stationswithin4.8kmwith50wattsormoreeffectiveradiatedpower (ERP)intheprimaryplaneofpolarizationintheazimuthaldirectionoftheTableMountain ReceivingZone; (iii)Stationswithin16kmwith1kWormoreERPintheprimaryplaneof polarizationintheazimuthaldirectionoftheTableMountainReceivingZone;or (iv)Stationswithin80kmwith25kWormoreERPintheprimaryplaneof polarizationintheazimuthaldirectionoftheTableMountainReceivingZone. (2)ApplicantsconcernedareurgedtocommunicatewiththeRadioFrequency 116 ManagementCoordinator,DepartmentofCommerce,ResearchSupportServices, NOAA/R/E5X2,BoulderLaboratories,BoulderCO80303;telephone(303)497-6548,in advanceoffilingtheirapplicationswiththeCommission. (3) TheCommissionwillnotscreenapplicationstodeterminewhetheradvance consultationhastakenplace.However,applicantsareadvisedthatsuchconsultationcan avoidobjectionsfromtheDepartmentofCommerceorproceedingstomodifyany authorizationwhichmaybegrantedwhich,infact,deliversasignalatthesiteinexcessofthe fieldstrengthspecifiedherein. (c)ProtectionforFederalCommunicationsCommissionmonitoringstations: (1)ApplicantsinthevicinityofanFCCmonitoringstationforaradiostation authorizationtooperatenewtransmittingfacilitiesorchangedtransmittingfacilitieswhich wouldincreasethefieldstrengthproducedoverthemonitoringstationoverthatpreviously authorizedareadvisedtogiveconsideration,priortofilingapplications,tothepossibleneed toprotecttheFCCstationsfromharmfulinterference.Geographicalcoordinatesofthe facilitieswhichrequireprotectionarelistedin§0.121(c)ofthischapter.Applicationsfor stations(exceptmobilestations)whichwillproduceonanyfrequencyadirectwave fundamentalfieldstrengthofgreaterthan10mV/mintheauthorizedbandwidthofservice (-65.8dBW/mpowerfluxdensityassumingafreespacecharacteristicimpedanceof120 2 ohms)atthereferencedcoordinates,maybeexaminedtodetermineextentofpossible interference. Dependingonthetheoreticalfieldstrengthvalueandexistingroot-sum-square orotherambientradiofieldsignallevelsattheindicatedcoordinates,aclauseprotectingthe monitoringstationmaybeaddedtothestationauthorization. (2)Intheeventthatcalculatedvalueofexpectedfieldexceeds10mV/m(-65.8 dBW/m)atthereferencecoordinates,orifthereisanyquestionwhetherfieldstrengthlevels 2 mightexceedthethresholdvalue,advanceconsultationwiththeFCCtodiscussany protectionnecessaryshouldbe considered. Prospectiveapplicantsmaycommunicatewith: Chief,ComplianceandInformationBureau,FederalCommunicationsCommission, Washington,DC20554,Telephone(202)418-1100. (3)Advanceconsultationissuggestedparticularlyforthoseapplicantswhohaveno reliabledatawhichindicateswhetherthefieldstrengthorpowerfluxdensityfigureindicated wouldbeexceededbytheirproposedradiofacilities(exceptmobilestations).Insuch instances,thefollowingisasuggestedguidefordeterminingwhetheranapplicantshould coordinate: (i)Allstationswithin2.4kilometers; (ii)Stationswithin4.8kilometerswith50wattsormoreaverageeffective radiatedpower(ERP)intheprimaryplaneofpolarizationintheazimuthaldirectionofthe MonitoringStations; (iii)Stationswithin16kilometerswith1kWormoreaverageERPinthe primaryplaneofpolarizationintheazimuthaldirectionoftheMonitoringStation;or (iv)Stationswithin80kilometerswith25kWormoreaverageERPinthe primaryplaneofpolarizationintheazimuthaldirectionoftheMonitoringStation. (4)Advancecoordinationforstationsoperatingabove1000MHzisrecommended onlywheretheproposedstationisinthevicinityofamonitoringstationdesignatedasa 117 satellitemonitoringfacilityin§0.121(c)ofthischapterandalsomeetsthecriteriaoutlinedin paragraphs(c)(2) and (c)(3)ofthissection. (5)TheCommissionwillnotscreenapplicationstodeterminewhetheradvance consultationhastakenplace.However,applicantsareadvisedthatsuchconsultationcan avoidobjectionsfromtheFederalCommunicationsCommissionormodificationofany authorizationwhichwillcauseharmfulinterference. § 101.125 Temporaryfixedantennaheightrestrictions. TheoverallantennastructureheightsemployedbymobilestationsintheLocalTelevision TransmissionServiceandbystationsauthorizedtooperateattemporaryfixedlocationsmay notexceedtheheightcriteriasetforthin§17.7ofthischapter,unlessineachinstance, authorizationforuseofaspecificmaximumantennaheight(abovegroundandabovemean sealevel)foreachlocationhasbeenobtainedfromtheCommissionpriortoerectionofthe antenna.Requestsforsuchauthorizationmustshowtheinclusivedatesoftheproposed operation. (Completeinformationastorulesconcerningtheconstruction,markingand lightingofantennastructuresiscontainedinpart17ofthischapter.) § 101.127 Topographicaldata. Determiningthelocationandheightabovesealeveloftheantennasite,theelevationor contourintervalsmustbetakenfromUnitedStatesGeologicalSurveyTopographic QuadrangleMaps,UnitedStatesArmyCorpsofEngineersmapsorTennesseeValley
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000364.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/2000/da000364.txt
  • * * (b) A station within 1600 m (1 mile) of an FCC monitoring facility must protect that facility from harmful interference. Failure to do so could result in imposition of operating restrictions upon the amateur station by a District Director pursuant to § 97.121 of this part. Geographical coordinates of the facilities that require protection are listed in § 0.121(c) of this chapter. * * * (2) If the routine environmental evaluation indicates that the RF electromagnetic fields could exceed the limits contained in § 1.1310 of this chapter in accessible areas, the licensee must take action to prevent human exposure to such RF electromagnetic fields. Further information on evaluating compliance with these limits can be found in the FCC's
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd030924.html
  • 09/24/2003. WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU ASSIGNMENT OF AUTHORIZATION AND TRANSFER OF CONTROL APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING. WTB [40]DOC-239139A1.pdf [41]DOC-239139A1.txt -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPEECHES -------------------------------------------------------------------------- REACHING BROADBAND NIRVANA UNITED POWERLINE COUNCIL ANNUAL CONFERENCE REMARKS OF COMMISSIONER KATHLEEN Q. ABERNATHY. CMMR. September 22, 2003 (As prepared for delivery) [42]DOC-239079A1.doc [43]DOC-239079A1.pdf [44]DOC-239079A1.txt -------------------------------------------------------------------------- TEXTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- EDITORIAL AMENDMENT OF PART 0 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended Section 0.121 of the Rules to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission's protected field installations where radio spectrum monitoring operations are conducted. Action by: the Managing Director. Adopted: 09/23/2003 by ORDER. (DA No. 03-2899). EB [45]DA-03-2899A1.doc [46]DA-03-2899A1.pdf [47]DA-03-2899A1.txt TV TABLE OF ALLOTMENT, OSAGE BEACH, MO. Proposed Amendment of TV Table of Allotments for this community. (Dkt No. 03-207). Action by:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2004/dd040913.html
  • telecommunications carrier. Action by: Deputy Chief, Consumer Policy Division, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau. Adopted: 09/10/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-2943). CGB [110]DA-04-2943A1.doc [111]DA-04-2943A1.pdf [112]DA-04-2943A1.txt NEW EDGE NETWORK, INC. Adopted Consent Decree in this proceeding. Action by: Chief, Enforcement Bureau. Adopted: 09/10/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-2852). EB [113]DA-04-2852A1.doc EDITORIAL AMENDMENT OF PART 0 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules to delete the geographical coordinates of the Commission's Anchorage, Alaska monitoring facility from the list of protected field installations. Action by: the Managing Director. Adopted: 09/08/2004 by ORDER. (DA No. 04-2923). EB [114]DA-04-2923A1.doc [115]DA-04-2923A1.pdf [116]DA-04-2923A1.txt FEDERAL-STATE JOINT BOARD ON UNIVERSAL SERVICE, NPCR, INC. D/B/A NEXTEL PARTHERS, PETITION FOR DESIGNATION AS AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER IN THE
• http://www.fcc.gov/Document_Indexes/Enforcement/2003_index_EB_Order.html
  • AMERICA FINANCIAL COPORATION (NOT FOR DAILY DIGEST). Official citation issued to Midwest America Financial Corporation, Chicago, Illinois for violation o 09/30/2003 [389]DOC-239456A1.doc [390]DOC-239456A1.pdf [391]DOC-239456A1.txt DA-03-2929 NEXTEL WIP LICENSE CORPORATION, PALEHUA RIDGE, HAWAII. Adopted Consent Decree in this proceeding. Terminated the Enforcement Bureau's forfeiture proceeding 09/26/2003 [392]DA-03-2929A1.doc [393]DA-03-2929A1.pdf [394]DA-03-2929A1.txt DA-03-2899 EDITORIAL AMENDMENT OF PART 0 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended Section 0.121 of the Rules to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission 09/24/2003 [395]DA-03-2899A1.doc [396]DA-03-2899A1.pdf [397]DA-03-2899A1.txt DOC-239187 GRAND VIEW PRODUCTS, INC. (NOT FOR DAILY DIGEST). Official citation issued to Grand View Products, Inc., Nyack, New York for violation of the TCPA and 09/24/2003 [398]DOC-239187A1.doc [399]DOC-239187A1.pdf [400]DOC-239187A1.txt DA-03-2900 CLARKE BROADCASTING CORPORATION. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $6,000 to
• http://www.fcc.gov/Document_Indexes/Enforcement/2004_index_EB_Order.html
  • V. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; SBC ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC. Denied the Request for Stay 09/14/2004 [575]DA-04-2912A1.doc [576]DA-04-2912A1.pdf [577]DA-04-2912A1.txt DA-04-2981 MILTON GOODMAN, APPLICANT FOR NARROWBAND PCS FACILITIES. Issued a forfeiture of $10,000 to Milton Goodman for failure to respond fully and in writing to a di 09/14/2004 [578]DA-04-2981A1.doc [579]DA-04-2981A1.pdf [580]DA-04-2981A1.txt DA-04-2923 EDITORIAL AMENDMENT OF PART 0 OF THE COMMISSION'S RULES. Amended Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules to delete the geographical coordinates of the Com 09/13/2004 [581]DA-04-2923A1.doc [582]DA-04-2923A1.pdf [583]DA-04-2923A1.txt DA-04-2852 NEW EDGE NETWORK, INC. Adopted Consent Decree in this proceeding 09/13/2004 [584]DA-04-2852A1.doc [585]DA-04-2852A1.pdf [586]DA-04-2852A1.txt DA-04-2903 WSJM, INC. Issued a monetary forfeiture in the amount of $12,800 to WSJM, Inc. for failure to maintain required 09/10/2004 [587]DA-04-2903A1.doc [588]DA-04-2903A1.pdf [589]DA-04-2903A1.txt DA-04-2888 HIP HOP CITY CORPORATION.
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2003/DA-03-2899A1.html
  • If you need the complete document, download the Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Editorial Amendment of Part 0 of the) Commission's Rules ) ) ORDER Adopted: September 23, 2003 Released: September 24, 2003 By the Managing Director: 1. In this Order, we amend Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission's protected field installations where radio spectrum monitoring operations are conducted.1 Specifically, this Order adds the geographical coordinates of the Commission's new Kenai, Alaska monitoring facility to the list of protected field installations set forth in Section 0.121(b). These locations are protected from harmful radio frequency interference
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2004/DA-04-2923A1.html
  • If you need the complete document, download the Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat version. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Editorial Amendment of Part 0 of the) Commission's Rules ) ) ORDER Adopted: September 8, 2004 Released: September 13, 2004 By the Managing Director: 1. In this Order, we amend Section 0.121(b) of the Commission's Rules (``Rules'') to update the geographical coordinate locations of the Commission's protected field installations where radio spectrum monitoring operations are conducted.1 Specifically, this Order deletes the geographical coordinates of the Commission's Anchorage, Alaska monitoring facility from the list of protected field installations set forth in Section 0.121(b).2 These locations are protected from harmful radio frequency interference to
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.doc http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/97-290.pdf
  • ERP in this manner, the Commission will require changes in the operating power while the station operates on automatic program test authority and before acting on the license application. 10. With respect to those FM commercial stations located near designated radio quiet and radio coordination zones, including Table Mountain and the Commission's monitoring stations (see 47 C.F.R. Sections 73.1030 and 0.121(c)), we will, as suggested by some commenters, extend eligibility to permit increases in ERP where the station in question has obtained prior written concurrence for the proposed ERP from the operator of the quiet zone, or the Commission's Compliance and Information Bureau in the case of a monitoring station. A copy of the written concurrence must be submitted with the
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/da97-2568.html
  • 73.215. ______ ii) If located in or near a radio quiet zone, radio coordination zone, or a Commission monitoring station, written approval has been secured from that radio quiet zone, radio coordination zone, or the Commission's Compliance and Information Bureau in the case of a monitoring station, PRIOR to implementation of the ERP increase. See 47 CFR Sections 73.1030 and 0.121(c). A copy of the written approval must be attached to the Form 302-FM application. ______ iii) The station does not require international coordination since ____ the transmitter site is not within 320 km of the Canadian or Mexican border; or ____ if the transmitter site is in a border zone, the station's International Class _____ is equal to or greater
• http://www.fcc.gov/ib/sand/mniab/traffic/files05/CREPOR05.pdf
  • 0.1 264,354,761 8.3 0.015.231.5 44.9 Greenland $298,948 0.3 0.083.3 6.0 10.4 $2,204 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $70 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 652,750 0.4 0.077.110.5 12.0 Iceland $3,001,848 3.9 0.024.722.6 48.8 $286,192 0.0 0.018.622.4 59.0 $633 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 32,771,878 2.5 0.027.525.0 45.0 Ireland $44,072,784 6.6 0.122.225.5 45.6 $5,536,092 2.9 0.029.814.8 52.5 $4,134,615 99.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 477,165,748 6.8 0.121.923.9 47.4 Italy $132,786,542 2.8 0.031.114.3 51.7 $8,640,532 0.8 0.037.519.9 41.8 $12,753,395 99.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1,258,138,243 2.7 0.032.316.3 48.7 Liechtenstein $2,777,434 0.5 2.625.513.6 57.9 $6,265 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 $710 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0100.0 5,929,750 1.0 3.128.124.7 43.1 Luxembourg $3,483,601 0.8 0.020.919.6 58.7 $164,671 0.6 0.023.119.8 56.5 $57,897 98.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 35,632,116 1.6 0.012.232.8 53.4 Malta $1,010,356
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/decdoc/letter/1997--12--08--erp.html
  • 73.215. ______ ii) If located in or near a radio quiet zone, radio coordination zone, or a Commission monitoring station, written approval has been secured from that radio quiet zone, radio coordination zone, or the Commission's Compliance and Information Bureau in the case of a monitoring station, PRIOR to implementation of the ERP increase. See 47 CFR Sections 73.1030 and 0.121(c). A copy of the written approval must be attached to the Form 302-FM application. ______ iii) The station does not require international coordination since ____ the transmitter site is not within 320 km of the Canadian or Mexican border; or ____ if the transmitter site is in a border zone, the station's International Class _____ is equal to or greater
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part78.pdf
  • a radio station authorization to operate new transmitting facilities or changed transmitting facilities which would increase the field strength produced over the monitoring station over that previously authorized are advised to give consideration, prior to filing applications, to the possible need to protect the FCC stations from harmful interference. Geographical coordinates of the facilities which require protection are listed in §0.121(c) of the Commission's Rules. Applications for stations (except mobile stations) which will produce on any frequency a direct wave fundamental field strength of greater than 10 mV/m in the authorized bandwidth of service (-65.8 dBW/m 2 power flux density assuming a free space characteristic impedance of 120 ohms) at the referenced coordinates, may be examined to determine extent of possible