FCC Web Documents citing 7.15

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2009 06 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2812A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2921A1.txt
  • Rcd 20,912 (1999), works to ensure spectral compatibility in the unbundled loop environment. These conditions require that the ADSL device: (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of ANSI T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. ) � �0� +D`� �� ) � � @& ! 1 A Q a q � ` � ��� � � � � )
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1039A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1243A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1606A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Bureau determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-167A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1704A1.txt
  • 2001. Petition at 2. Petition at 3, citing the Alcatel Order. Alcatel Order, supra, at 4395, para. 17. The modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in section 7.15 of the same document. Champlain Telephone Company Comments at 2. See, e.g., Alcatel Order at 4395-4396, paras. 16-20. Alameda Recon. Order at 1666, para. 18. Id. at 1667, para. 19. Verizon Ex Parte, April 3, 2001. Petition at 2. Verizon Ex Parte, April 3, 2001. Verizon Ex Parte, April 3, 2001. There are two types of asymmetry in characteristics of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-1801A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Bureau determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-304A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-471A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-695A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1412A2.txt
  • NPA/NANP Life Impact 6.1.8 Contingent, within 30 days of receipt of the updated NRUF Report. Reports to Regulatory Authorities 6.1.9, 8.2.2 Contingent, within 10 days of request following 30 days after the NRUF reporting deadline. NRUF Anomalies 6.1.11, 6.3.3, 8.2.1 Contingent, in case of unresolveable anomalies, to State Regulatory Commissions or FCC. Also annually. Reserved. Reserved. NANC Annual Report 7.10, 7.15, 8.1 Annually during first quarter. CO Code Growth Rate by NPA 8.2.2 Semi-annually. Aggregated Growth Rates, Pooled vs. Non-Pooled 8.2.2 Upon demand. Aggregated Utilization Data 8.2.2 Upon demand. Utilization Rates, Pooled vs. Prior to Being Pooled, Plus Rates in Non-Pooled NPAs 8.2.2 Upon demand. NPA Relief Activity Status Report 8.3 Monthly. Disaggregated Data by State 8.2 By request, 30 days
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3470A8.txt
  • immediatelyobviousthatwomenareunder-representedineverylineofbusiness.Across allnon-farm,privatelyheldbusinesseswithpaidemployees,womenownonly17.74%of �rms,whilemenown68.41%.Femaleownershipisstrongestintheeducationsectorand weakestinutilities.Amongthethreelinesofmediaenterprisesunderanalysishere(Radio Station,TVStations,andNewspaperPublishers),womenown14.01%,13.68%,and20.56% respectively,numberswhicharebroadlyinlinewiththeoveralluniverseofbusinesses. Therefore,whateverisdrivingtheseasymmetriesisclearlysystematic,notspeci�ctothese particularindustries.Asnotedabove,thenumbersreportedinTable7intheappendix showamuchhigherdegreeofvariation,duetothedi�erencesinthepercentofpublicly owned�rms.However,thisdoesnotchangethebroadconclusionthatthethreemedia industriesarebasicallyinlinewiththebroaduniverseof�rmswithregardtothestatusof femaleownership.Womenareunder-representedacrosstheboard. 5 Table1:OwnershipbyGender NAICSName %Female%Male%Equal 22 Utilities 10.58 75.72 13.70 23 Construction 7.32 79.84 12.84 31-33 Manufacturing 13.78 72.73 13.49 42 WholesaleTrade 12.88 73.78 13.34 44-45 RetailTrade 20.27 61.18 18.55 48-49 Transportation&Warehousing 12.34 70.22 17.44 51 Information 16.12 70.78 13.10 515112 RadioStations 14.01 76.88 9.11 515120 TVStations 13.67 79.18 7.15 511110 NewspaperPublishers 20.56 61.72 17.72 52 FinanceandInsurance 15.07 76.08 8.85 53 RealEstate,Rental,Leasing 20.60 63.67 15.73 54 Professional,Scienti�c,TechnicalServices 19.09 71.82 9.09 55 ManagementofCompanies&Enterprises Administrative&Support&Waste 12.09 79.80 8.10 56 Management&RemediationService 20.86 64.73 14.41 61 EducationalServices 39.47 41.85 18.68 62 HealthCare&SocialAssistance 23.78 68.57 7.65 71 Arts,Entertainment&Recreation 21.21 62.74 16.05 72 Accommodation&FoodServices 21.10 58.12 20.78 81 OtherServices(exceptpublic) 22.70 61.35 15.95 AllNon-FarmBusinesses 17.74 68.41 13.85
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-490A2.txt
  • and annually. NPA/NANP Life Impact 6.1.8 Contingent, within 30 days of receipt of the updated NRUF Report. Reports to Regulatory Authorities 6.1.9, 8.2.2 Contingent, within ten days of request following 30 days after the NRUF reporting deadline. NRUF Anomalies 6.1.11, 6.3.3, 8.2.1 Contingent, in case of unresolveable anomalies, to State Regulatory Commissions or FCC. Also annually. NANC Annual Report 7.10, 7.15, 8.1 Annually during first quarter. CO Code Growth Rate by NPA 8.2.2 Semi-annually. Aggregated Growth Rates, Pooled vs. Non-Pooled 8.2.2 Upon demand. Aggregated Utilization Data 8.2.2 Upon demand. NPA Relief Activity Status Report 8.3 Monthly. Disaggregated Data by State 8.2 By request, 30 days after the deadline for NRUF reporting and before the subsequent NRUF reporting deadline. Number of Carriers
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • 4.50 -1.16 5.73 8.21 351101 A ATKINS TEL. CO. 13.76 -0.24 14.03 69.43 351105 C AYRSHIRE FMRS. MUT. TEL. CO. -4.70 5.73 -9.87 -45.60 351106 C ALPINE COMMUNICATIONS, L.C. -7.28 -1.42 -5.94 -45.53 351107 A BALDWIN-NASHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.58 3.18 5.23 11.11 351108 A BARNES CITY COOP. TEL. CO. -3.71 -5.56 1.96 -8.07 351110 C BERNARD TEL. CO., INC. 7.15 -2.68 10.10 11.36 351112 A BREDA TEL. COOP. 5.18 -1.57 6.86 12.33 351113 A BROOKLYN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.89 -0.87 12.88 INFINITE 351114 A THE BURT TEL. CO. 7.12 -2.37 9.72 25.66 351115 A BUTLER-BREMER MUT. TEL. CO. 12.39 -1.69 14.32 66.69 351118 A CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 18.73 5.29 12.76 76.23 351119 A CASEY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.38 1.90 9.31
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A5.txt
  • 4.50 -1.16 5.73 8.21 351101 A ATKINS TEL. CO. 13.76 -0.24 14.03 69.43 351105 C AYRSHIRE FMRS. MUT. TEL. CO. -4.70 5.73 -9.87 -45.60 351106 C ALPINE COMMUNICATIONS, L.C. -7.28 -1.42 -5.94 -45.53 351107 A BALDWIN-NASHVILLE TEL. CO., INC. 8.58 3.18 5.23 11.11 351108 A BARNES CITY COOP. TEL. CO. -3.71 -5.56 1.96 -8.07 351110 C BERNARD TEL. CO., INC. 7.15 -2.68 10.10 11.36 351112 A BREDA TEL. COOP. 5.18 -1.57 6.86 12.33 351113 A BROOKLYN MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.89 -0.87 12.88 INFINITE 351114 A THE BURT TEL. CO. 7.12 -2.37 9.72 25.66 351115 A BUTLER-BREMER MUT. TEL. CO. 12.39 -1.69 14.32 66.69 351118 A CASCADE COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 18.73 5.29 12.76 76.23 351119 A CASEY MUTUAL TEL. CO. 11.38 1.90 9.31
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A1.txt
  • 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.90 6.50 13.50 13.40 Maryland 7.42 8.25 7.42 0.84 3.50 3.50 0.42 1.75 1.75 7.84 10.00 9.17 8.68 13.50 12.67 Massachusetts 8.13 8.25 8.13 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.88 10.00 9.88 13.38 13.50 13.38 Michigan 7.09 8.25 7.29 0.00 3.50 1.99 0.00 1.75 0.99 7.09 10.00 8.28 7.09 13.50 10.27 Minnesota 6.65 8.25 7.15 0.00 3.50 1.54 0.00 1.75 0.77 6.65 10.00 7.92 6.65 13.50 9.46 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25 10.00 9.92 8.25 13.50 13.27 Missouri 6.50 8.25 8.04 0.00 1.16 0.77 0.00 0.58 0.39 6.50 8.83 8.43 6.50 9.99 9.20 Montana 8.23 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 2.93 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.23 10.00 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A4.txt
  • 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.90 6.50 13.50 13.40 Maryland 7.42 8.25 7.42 0.84 3.50 3.50 0.42 1.75 1.75 7.84 10.00 9.17 8.68 13.50 12.67 Massachusetts 8.13 8.25 8.13 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.88 10.00 9.88 13.38 13.50 13.38 Michigan 7.09 8.25 7.29 0.00 3.50 1.99 0.00 1.75 0.99 7.09 10.00 8.28 7.09 13.50 10.27 Minnesota 6.65 8.25 7.15 0.00 3.50 1.54 0.00 1.75 0.77 6.65 10.00 7.92 6.65 13.50 9.46 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.35 0.00 1.75 1.67 8.25 10.00 9.92 8.25 13.50 13.27 Missouri 6.50 8.25 8.04 0.00 1.16 0.77 0.00 0.58 0.39 6.50 8.83 8.43 6.50 9.99 9.20 Montana 8.23 8.25 8.24 0.00 3.50 2.93 0.00 1.75 1.47 8.23 10.00 9.70 8.23 13.50 12.64
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269251A5.txt
  • 544342 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF TUOLUMNE DBA FRONTIER COMM -0.97 -0.01 -0.95 -11.34 545170 C PACIFIC BELL 0.02 -3.01 3.12 0.00 COLORADO TOTAL -4.88 -3.70 -1.23 -7.81 461835 C SUNFLOWER TELEPHONE CO.,INC. - CO -10.60 -3.45 -7.40 -15.87 462178 C AGATE MUTUAL TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE ASSOC. 25.61 -6.29 34.04 34.20 462181 C BIJOU TEL COOPERATIVE ASSOC. INC -2.61 -1.11 -1.52 -7.15 462182 C BLANCA TELEPHONE CO. 1.57 2.03 -0.46 -0.72 462184 C DELTA COUNTY TELE-COMM INC. -1.47 -2.94 1.51 -12.81 462185 C CENTURYTEL OF EAGLE, INC. 0.03 -2.06 2.13 -2.87 462186 C EASTERN SLOPE RURAL TEL ASSN INC 12.60 -1.09 13.85 24.65 462187 C THE EL PASO COUNTY TELEPHONE COMPANY 0.91 -3.08 4.11 -0.83 462188 C FARMERS TEL CO, INC. -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-270407A1.txt
  • Citizens 6.13 6.44 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,570 105 422 Hawaiian Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 374 53 205 Iowa Telecom 6.14 6.14 8.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 186 9 42 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,327 1,041 3,030 SBC 4.96 4.83 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,610 3,952 14,236 Sprint 5.74 5.67 7.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,032 520 1,563 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 2.08 1.51 350 47 82 Verizon 6.30 6.32 6.79 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.07 26,396 3,948 13,077 Price Caps 5.84 5.81 6.11 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 80,520 11,092 38,101 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,604 NA 2,071 Price Caps and NECA 5.91 5.81 6.27 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • GUNNISON TEL. CO. 10.55 8.94 1.47 -7.33 502282 A MANTI TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.56 1.75 2.76 -1.10 502282A A MANTI TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.95 -6.67 3.99 2.74 502283 A SKYLINE TELECOM 9.88 -1.74 11.82 40.89 502283A A SKYLINE TELECOM 8.19 -6.18 15.32 45.83 502284 C BEEHIVE TELEPHONE CO., INC., UT 17.62 0.87 16.60 21.14 502286 C SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TEL. ASSN. INC. 7.15 -0.09 7.25 42.32 502287 C UBTA-UBET COMMUNICATIONS INC. (UINTAH BASIN) -29.75 3.79 -32.31 -53.92 502287A C UBTA-UBET COMMUNICATIONS INC. (UINTAH BASIN) -0.25 -0.70 0.45 -26.37 502288 C ALL WEST COMMUNICATIONS-UT 4.95 3.28 1.62 2.68 502288A C ALL WEST COMMUNICATIONS-UT 9.77 -1.03 10.92 18.06 503032 C BEAR LAKE COMMUNICATIONS 5.16 -3.27 8.72 9.56 504429 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF UT DBA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A5.txt
  • GUNNISON TEL. CO. 10.55 8.94 1.47 -7.33 502282 A MANTI TELEPHONE COMPANY 4.56 1.75 2.76 -1.10 502282A A MANTI TELEPHONE COMPANY -2.95 -6.67 3.99 2.74 502283 A SKYLINE TELECOM 9.88 -1.74 11.82 40.89 502283A A SKYLINE TELECOM 8.19 -6.18 15.32 45.83 502284 C BEEHIVE TELEPHONE CO., INC., UT 17.62 0.87 16.60 21.14 502286 C SOUTH CENTRAL UTAH TEL. ASSN. INC. 7.15 -0.09 7.25 42.32 502287 C UBTA-UBET COMMUNICATIONS INC. (UINTAH BASIN) -29.75 3.79 -32.31 -53.92 502287A C UBTA-UBET COMMUNICATIONS INC. (UINTAH BASIN) -0.25 -0.70 0.45 -26.37 502288 C ALL WEST COMMUNICATIONS-UT 4.95 3.28 1.62 2.68 502288A C ALL WEST COMMUNICATIONS-UT 9.77 -1.03 10.92 18.06 503032 C BEAR LAKE COMMUNICATIONS 5.16 -3.27 8.72 9.56 504429 C CITIZENS TEL CO OF UT DBA
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A9.txt
  • Citizens 6.13 6.44 9.20 0.00 0.00 4.31 0.75 1,570 105 422 Hawaiian Telecom 6.50 7.00 8.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 374 53 205 Iowa Telecom 6.14 6.14 8.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 186 9 42 Qwest 6.01 6.23 6.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,327 1,041 3,030 AT&T 4.96 4.83 4.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,610 3,952 14,236 Sprint 5.74 5.67 7.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,032 520 1,563 Valor 6.50 7.00 9.20 0.00 0.00 2.08 1.51 350 47 82 Verizon 6.30 6.32 6.79 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.07 26,396 3,948 13,077 Price Caps 5.84 5.81 6.11 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.04 80,520 11,092 38,101 NECA 6.50 NA 9.20 0.00 NA 0.00 NA 9,604 NA 2,071 Price Caps and NECA 5.91 5.81 6.27 0.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-284932A1.txt
  • 0.00 1.75 1.74 8.14 10.00 9.90 8.14 13.50 13.38 Maryland 7.42 8.25 7.42 0.84 3.48 3.48 0.42 1.74 1.74 7.84 9.99 9.16 8.68 13.47 12.64 Massachusetts 8.14 8.25 8.14 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.89 10.00 9.89 13.39 13.50 13.39 Michigan 7.10 8.25 7.29 0.76 3.50 2.16 0.38 1.75 1.08 7.48 10.00 8.37 8.24 13.50 10.53 Minnesota 6.67 8.25 7.15 0.00 3.50 1.89 0.00 1.75 0.95 6.67 10.00 8.09 6.67 13.50 9.99 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.24 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.32 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.56 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.03 0.00 1.75 1.51 8.25 10.00 9.76 8.25 13.50 12.79
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A1.txt
  • 0.36 40 Dist. of Columbia 169,068 26,232 471,042 3.85 3.85 3.85 31 0.34 38 Florida 5,517,785 575,814 2,289,423 6.50 6.76 7.41 681 7.58 840 Georgia 2,257,368 203,652 1,122,837 6.50 6.76 7.23 290 3.23 358 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 317,914 31,904 194,946 6.50 7.00 8.12 46 0.52 57 Idaho 399,960 30,887 186,184 6.37 6.50 7.15 49 0.54 60 Illinois 3,122,632 370,442 2,009,701 4.81 4.82 5.20 327 3.64 404 Indiana 1,781,318 113,283 789,524 5.90 6.01 6.96 200 2.23 247 Iowa 807,296 40,858 347,179 5.40 5.26 6.39 81 0.91 101 Kansas 586,926 34,884 329,442 5.47 5.42 5.96 64 0.72 79 Kentucky 1,101,066 43,694 437,053 6.37 6.66 7.48 127 1.41 157 Louisiana 1,107,393 93,941 513,618 6.50 6.76 6.98
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A3.txt
  • 0.36 40 Dist. of Columbia 169,068 26,232 471,042 3.85 3.85 3.85 31 0.34 38 Florida 5,517,785 575,814 2,289,423 6.50 6.76 7.41 681 7.58 840 Georgia 2,257,368 203,652 1,122,837 6.50 6.76 7.23 290 3.23 358 Guam NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Hawaii 317,914 31,904 194,946 6.50 7.00 8.12 46 0.52 57 Idaho 399,960 30,887 186,184 6.37 6.50 7.15 49 0.54 60 Illinois 3,122,632 370,442 2,009,701 4.81 4.82 5.20 327 3.64 404 Indiana 1,781,318 113,283 789,524 5.90 6.01 6.96 200 2.23 247 Iowa 807,296 40,858 347,179 5.40 5.26 6.39 81 0.91 101 Kansas 586,926 34,884 329,442 5.47 5.42 5.96 64 0.72 79 Kentucky 1,101,066 43,694 437,053 6.37 6.66 7.48 127 1.41 157 Louisiana 1,107,393 93,941 513,618 6.50 6.76 6.98
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A4.txt
  • 0.00 1.75 1.74 8.14 10.00 9.90 8.14 13.50 13.38 Maryland 7.42 8.25 7.42 0.84 3.48 3.48 0.42 1.74 1.74 7.84 9.99 9.16 8.68 13.47 12.64 Massachusetts 8.14 8.25 8.14 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.89 10.00 9.89 13.39 13.50 13.39 Michigan 7.10 8.25 7.29 0.76 3.50 2.16 0.38 1.75 1.08 7.48 10.00 8.37 8.24 13.50 10.53 Minnesota 6.67 8.25 7.15 0.00 3.50 1.89 0.00 1.75 0.95 6.67 10.00 8.09 6.67 13.50 9.99 Mississippi 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.33 0.00 1.75 1.66 8.25 10.00 9.91 8.25 13.50 13.24 Missouri 6.50 8.25 7.32 0.00 3.50 3.49 0.00 1.75 1.75 6.50 10.00 9.06 6.50 13.50 12.56 Montana 8.25 8.25 8.25 0.00 3.50 3.03 0.00 1.75 1.51 8.25 10.00 9.76 8.25 13.50 12.79
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-287688A5.txt
  • TELEPHONE COMPANY 9.74 -1.29 11.17 13.86 442107 A LIVINGSTON TELEPHONE COMPANY 2.70 0.63 2.05 0.00 442109 C CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS COMPANY -11.08 -3.97 -7.41 -49.77 442112 C MID-PLAINS RURAL TEL. CO-OP. INC. -1.34 -1.61 0.28 -6.61 442114 C CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF TEXAS -4.89 -7.23 2.53 0.00 442116 C MUENSTER TEL. CORP. OF TX DBA NORTEX COMM. 7.32 0.16 7.15 14.00 442117 C CENTURYTEL OF PORT ARANSAS, INC. -6.66 -4.51 -2.25 -30.91 442130 C PEOPLES TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE - TX 8.26 -0.21 8.48 14.20 442131 C POKA-LAMBRO TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC. -9.62 -5.73 -4.13 -26.36 442134 C RIVIERA TELEPHONE COMPANY INC. 5.53 -3.44 9.29 7.25 442135 C SOUTHWEST TEXAS TELEPHONE COMPANY 22.17 -1.94 24.58 43.07 442140 C CENTURYTEL OF SAN MARCOS, INC.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-103A1.txt
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Bureau determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level of
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-262A1.pdf.
  • Rate 0.46 0.3 0.53 0.29 0.56 0.36 0.61 0.37 0.72 0.4 MR-3 - Missed Repair Appointments MR-3-01-2100% Missed Repair Appointment � Loop 15.36 15.29 18.14 18.87 18.68 19.87 19.09 19.8 24.7 24.4 MR-3-02-2100% Missed Repair Appointment � Central Office 4.75 1.59 4.96 9.68 5.77 6.67 4.82 8.33 8.1 9.76 MR-3-03-2100% Missed Repair Appointment - CPE /TOK/FOK 5.9 2.84 7.22 5.93 7.15 8.28 7.68 7.02 10.62 12.22 MR-4 - Trouble Duration Intervals MR-4-01-2100Mean Time To Repair � Total 18.87 16.52 18.07 15.2 17.81 13.36 18.8 15.6 21.73 17.6 MR-4-02-2100Mean Time to Repair � Loop Trouble 20.37 17.35 19.23 15.93 18.94 14.15 19.82 16.29 22.68 18.31 MR-4-03-2100Mean Time To Repair � Central Office Trouble 8.4 11.11 7.63 9.76 8.11 7.14 7.43 8.31 9.48
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-02-330A1.txt
  • 7 UNE Loop 2/4 wire analog 8db and 5.5db loop 2.72 2.29 2.78 2.38 7 UNE Loop 2/4 wire analog 8db and 5.5db loop with LNP 99.8595.00 99.9195.00100.0095.00 7 UNE Loop 2/4 wire analog 8db and 5.5db loop without LNP 1.71 2.04 1.70 2.00 1.57 1.84 7 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital IDSL capable 7.74 9.99 7.8310.21 7.4610.30 7.69 9.94 7.15 9.51 7 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital ISDN capable 5.00 9.99 1.0010.21 10.30 9.94 5.00 9.51abcde 7 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing - Conditioned 9.7010.00 10.0014.20 10.2315.25 10.0010.00 8.9410.00 d 7 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital Line Sharing - Non Conditioned 3.02 3.18 3.15 3.02 3.05 3.01 3.02 3.02 3.00 3.03 7 UNE Loop 2 wire Digital xDSL
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-246A1.txt
  • that band have been resolved, we will be able to revisit the December 2008 relocation date as necessary. A non-interference, coordinated basis means that the military services may operate systems without an allocation in certain non-Federal Government bands subject to local coordination. Local coordination between FCC field personnel and military field personnel is described in the NTIA Manual at Section 7.15.3 (Military Communications in non-Government Bands Above 25 MHz for Tactical and Training Operations) and in Section 7.17 (Military Communications at Test Ranges in non-Government Bands Above 25 MHz). No change is contemplated in these well-established procedures. See NTIA Manual of Regulations & Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management, May 2004 Revision (``NTIA Manual''), Sections 7.15.3 and 7.17. The NTIA Manual
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/data/papersAndStudies/fc99136.pdf
  • 9.49 31 99.70 40 9.49 31 Urban Comm. PCS (PK) 3.47 4.42 7.89 32 148.28 31 7.89 32 21st Cent. Telesis (PK) 4.32 3.51 7.83 33 99.83 39 7.83 33 Radiofone 2.19 5.22 7.41 34 106.98 38 7.41 34 Pocket Comm. 7.33 7.33 35 109.89 37 7.33 35 Magnacom (PK) 1.77 5.47 7.23 36 81.17 43 7.23 36 McLeod, Inc. 7.15 7.15 37 71.47 46 7.15 37 Puerto Rico Telephone (9) 3.52 3.52 7.04 38 123.27 35 3.52 46 Vanguard Cellular 6.80 6.80 39 170.11 30 6.80 38 Chase Telecom 6.16 6.16 40 184.89 27 6.16 39 American Cellular 5.17 5.17 41 129.35 33 5.17 40 Clearcomm 5.12 5.12 42 76.78 45 5.12 41 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/2004broadbandforum/comments/YDI_understandingdb.pdf
  • Microwave antennas (above 1 GHz) is generally given in dBi. A dipole antenna has 2.14 dB gain over a 0 dBi isotropic antenna. So if an antenna gain is given in dBd, not dBi, add 2.15 to it to get the dBi rating, For example, it an omni antenna has 5 dBd gain, it would have 5 + 2.15 = 7.15 dBi gain. NOTE: If an antenna gain is just specified in dB from a manufacturer, be sure to ask if it is dBi or dBd. If they cannot tell you or do not know the difference, then you should consider buying from another vendor! EIRP (Effective Isotopic Radiated Power) Effective Isotropic Radiated Power is defined as the effective power found
• http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/cellular/data/AdministratorGuidelines090503.pdf
  • be defined by these guidelines and by contractual agreements between the Central Database Administrator and the other SID Administrators. 7.14 Any SID Administrator may propose to take over Central Database Administrator responsibility on a quarterly basis by presenting its proposal to the other administrators and scheduling a conference call for group discussion. A consensus vote is required for any change. 7.15 If a SID Administrator believes the Central Database Administrator is not performing its duties pursuant to the adopted guidelines, the Administrator may call for a replacement of the Central Database Administrator. A consensus vote is required for a change in the Database Administrator. Parties must seek to resolve any disputes according to the terms of the contractual agreements with the
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99181.wp
  • 7 Subpart A -- Scope - Who must comply with these rules? 7.1 Who must comply with these rules? Subpart B -- Definitions 7.3 Definitions Subpart C -- Obligations - What must covered entities do? 7.5 Manufacturers 7.7 Service Providers 7.9 Product Design , Development and Evaluation 7.11 Information Pass through 7.13 Information, Documentation and Training Subpart D -- Enforcement 7.15Generally 7.16Informal or formal complaints 7.17 Informal complaints; form and content 7.18Procedure; designation of agents for service 7.19Answers to informal complaints 7.20Review and disposition of informal complaints 7.21Formal Complaints, applicability of Sections 1.720 - 1.736 of the rules 7.22Formal complaints based on unsatisfied informal complaints 7.23Actions by the Commission on its on motion Authority: 47 U.S.C. Section 1, 154(i), 154(j) 208,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1999/fcc99238.txt
  • users, thus holding competitive LEC expansion plans hostage until Bell Atlantic is ready. Covad Comments at 36, n.63. See, e.g., Covad Comments at 36. 47 U.S.C. � 706(a). Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15692, para. 382. Id. Covad Comments at 42-43; Rhythms Reply Comments at 21. See generally Bellcore Notes on the Network, Loop Transmission, ch.7.15, (Telcordia, 1997); Regis J. Bates and Donald Gregory, Voice and Data Communications Handbook Signature Edition, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1997), at 76-77. Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15692, para. 382. 47 C.F.R. � 51.507(e). See generally 47 C.F.R. �� 51.501 et seq.; Local Competition First Report and Order, 11 FCC Rcd at 15875-15876, paras. 749-751. MGC
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000388.doc
  • would introduce innovative equipment, increase consumer choice and enhance consumer value, while supporting the goal of providing broadband services to all Americans. 7. Alcatel further claims that the Model 1000 ADSL modem will not cause harm to the network because the Model 1000 ADSL modem complies with all Part 68 requirements other than section 68.308(e)(1) and satisfies sections 7.14 and 7.15 of ANSI T1.413-1998, which is a widely accepted industry standard. Alcatel notes that more than 100,000 of these modems have been deployed in the PSTN by BellSouth, Ameritech, Bell Atlantic and Southwestern Bell in the provision of ADSL offerings, and that the same technical characteristics of those modems will safeguard the network when they are marketed as customer premises equipment.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da000981.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001183.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001430.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001613.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001653.doc
  • or more portions of the Commission's rules does not excuse an applicant from compliance with the Commission's other requirements. On February 8, 2000, NSD released an Order granting waiver of section 68.308(e) of the Commission's rules to permit Alcatel USA, Inc., to register its Model 1000 Asynchronous Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) modem, a device that complied with sections 7.14 and 7.15 of ANSI T1.413-1998 standard. In that proceeding, we formulated and applied a two-part test to determine the merits of a request for waiver of Section 68.308(e)(1) to permit registration of non-conforming Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) (Nortel Test). The first prong of the test is an evaluation of the CPE's benefit to the public interest, with an emphasis on the potential
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001696.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001965.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002173.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002407.doc
  • the waiver subject to two conditions (Alcatel conditions), which were corrected by erratum to read as follows: the ADSL modem must (1) meet the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of T1.413- Issue Two (1998), and (2) operate with an aggregate power of less than 12.5 dBm over the range 25.875 to 138 kHz as specified in Section 7.15 of the same document. 5. The Alcatel Waiver Order additionally established a streamlined process for Part 68 waivers of ADSL modems, eliminating the usual public notice and comment procedures if a petitioner certifies that the above two conditions are met. The Commission determined that because the ANSI T1.413 - Issue Two (1998) standard for ADSL modems reflects a reasonable level
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/er000388.doc
  • 47 C.F.R. � 68.308(e)(1), so that it may register under Part 68 its Model 1000 Asynchronous Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) modem. The order additionally established a streamlined process to waive the same section for other ADSL equipment, provided that it meets the two performance conditions required of Alcatel in paragraph 26. The first of these conditions cited "sections 7.14 and 7.15" of an industry standard. The second condition did not cite a standard. Only section 7.14 should have been cited in the first condition. Section 7.15 should instead be cited in the second condition. The conditions in paragraph 26 of that order are hereby amended to read as follows: "(1) meets the transmitter spectral response requirements specified in Section 7.14 of
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da992281.doc
  • part of numerous carrier network offerings. We seek comment on Alcatel's claimed benefits with respect to innovation, consumer choice, consumer value, etc., and generally on the benefits to consumers were we to grant this waiver. Alcatel claims that the Model 1000 ADSL modem will not cause harm to the network because the Model 1000 ADSL modem satisfies Sections 7.14 and 7.15 of ANSI T1.413-1998, a widely accepted industry standard. More specifically, Alcatel claims that this modem's performance meets the transmitter spectral response power spectral density mask for the transmitted signal, as required in Section 7.14 of T1.413-1998; and operates within an aggregate transmit power over the 25.875 to 138 kHz band of less than 12.5 dBm. In support of the claims
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror00.pdf
  • 10.99 8.27 10.52 29Horry Telephone Cooperative, Inc 11.88 11.58 3.84 19.73 9.57 14.48 30Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company 11.77 11.43 11.65 11.65 11.65 12.58 31Lancaster Telephone Company 9.50 11.45 5.06 8.26 (14.00) 5.18 32Odin Telephone Exchange, Inc. 2/ 10.44 (11.67) 12.21 (3.82) 11.17 33Puerto Rico Telephone Company 9.63 11.45 3.63 21.70 (133.31) 0.11 6.45 34Rock Hill Telephone Company 9.39 11.47 6.52 7.15 (0.68) 4.61 35Roseville Telephone Company 18.42 11.21 12.82 54.50 33.94 44.73 36Taconic Telephone Corporation 1/ 13.69 13.68 10.73 11.68 (112.50) 27.17 14.55 37Telephone Utilities Exchange Carrier Assoc. 11.97 11.25 16.77 12.10 38TXU Communications Telephone Company, Inc. 2/ 11.67 11.82 9.40 13.44 15.72 14.29 39Utelco, Inc. 2/ 11.50 40Virgin Islands Telephone Corporation 11.48 11.45 13.33 11.38 (243.33) 13.00 11.15 41Warwick Valley
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/ror96.pdf
  • TOTAL AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. 1/ PUBLIC SWITCHED NETWORK: 12.18 PRIVATE LINE: 8.26 NATIONAL EXCHANGE CARRIER ASSOCIATION 12.41% 12.45% 17.17% - - - 11.80% 1ILLINOIS BELL 12.10 12.26 10.87 16.13 (90.24) 10.91 12.66 2INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE 12.61 12.24 12.86 11.24 (16.26) 15.17 12.92 3MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE 12.99 12.85 12.61 14.63 43.57 11.79 13.37 4OHIO BELL TELEPHONE 12.72 12.32 13.09 7.15 (5.70) 17.86 12.98 5WISCONSIN BELL INC. 13.60 12.32 10.36 7.94 12.73 23.48 16.66 6NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE CO. 13.17 12.33 12.53 14.05 7.31 15.69 14.74 7THE BELL TELEPHONE CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA 11.98 12.51 9.37 8.93 16.23 16.87 12.67 8THE CHESAPEAKE AND POTOMAC TELEPHONE COS. 12.51 12.59 10.54 16.13 9.36 10.49 13.38 9THE DIAMOND STATE TELEPHONE CO. 12.50 12.59 15.65 7.96
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend504.pdf
  • 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 North Dakota 5.25 7.75 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.25 0.00 1.75 1.12 5.25 9.50 8.84 5.25 13.00 11.09 N. Marianna Islands 6.75 6.75 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Ohio 6.94 7.75 7.27 0.00 3.50 0.96 0.00 1.75 0.48 6.94 9.50 7.75 6.94 13.00 8.71 Oklahoma 5.25 7.75 7.15 0.00 1.16 1.13 0.00 0.58 0.57 5.25 8.33 7.72 5.25 9.49 8.85 Oregon 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Pennsylvania 6.01 7.75 7.72 0.00 2.50 1.20 0.00 1.25 0.60 6.01 9.00 8.32 6.01 11.50 9.52 Puerto Rico 6.75 7.75 7.75 3.30 3.50 3.31 1.65 1.75 1.66 8.40 9.50 9.41 11.70 13.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/IAD/trend803.pdf
  • 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 North Dakota 5.25 7.75 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.25 0.00 1.75 1.12 5.25 9.50 8.84 5.25 13.00 11.09 N. Marianna Islands 6.75 6.75 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Ohio 6.94 7.75 7.27 0.00 3.50 0.96 0.00 1.75 0.48 6.94 9.50 7.75 6.94 13.00 8.71 Oklahoma 5.25 7.75 7.15 0.00 1.16 1.13 0.00 0.58 0.57 5.25 8.33 7.72 5.25 9.49 8.85 Oregon 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Pennsylvania 6.01 7.75 7.72 0.00 2.50 1.20 0.00 1.25 0.60 6.01 9.00 8.32 6.01 11.50 9.52 Puerto Rico 6.75 7.75 7.75 3.30 3.50 3.31 1.65 1.75 1.66 8.40 9.50 9.41 11.70 13.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-2.pdf
  • 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 North Dakota 5.25 7.75 7.72 0.00 3.50 2.25 0.00 1.75 1.12 5.25 9.50 8.84 5.25 13.00 11.09 N. Marianna Islands 6.75 6.75 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 6.75 Ohio 6.94 7.75 7.27 0.00 3.50 0.96 0.00 1.75 0.48 6.94 9.50 7.75 6.94 13.00 8.71 Oklahoma 5.25 7.75 7.15 0.00 1.16 1.13 0.00 0.58 0.57 5.25 8.33 7.72 5.25 9.49 8.85 Oregon 7.75 7.75 7.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 1.75 1.75 1.75 9.50 9.50 9.50 13.00 13.00 13.00 Pennsylvania 6.01 7.75 7.72 0.00 2.50 1.20 0.00 1.25 0.60 6.01 9.00 8.32 6.01 11.50 9.52 Puerto Rico 6.75 7.75 7.75 3.30 3.50 3.31 1.65 1.75 1.66 8.40 9.50 9.41 11.70 13.00
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-3.pdf
  • CO.-DYSART 14.19 1.83 12.14 68.93 351166 A FARMERS & MERCHANTS MUTUAL TEL. CO. 7.95 -4.78 13.37 79.64 351167 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-NORTH -6.10 -3.97 -2.21 0.00 351168 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOP TEL CO- HARLAN 2.98 -1.59 4.64 4.39 351169 A FARMERS MUTUAL COOP. TEL. CO.-MOULTON 10.97 0.54 10.37 39.15 351170 C IOWA TELECOMM. SVCS. DBA IOWA TELECOM-SYSTEMS -7.15 -2.61 -4.67 0.00 351171 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-JESUP 14.88 1.93 12.70 0.00 351172 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-NORA SPRINGS 14.88 2.75 11.81 60.94 351173 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. COOP.-SHELLSBURG 13.93 1.77 11.95 61.66 351174 A FARMERS MUTUAL TEL. CO.-STANTON 7.30 0.32 6.96 16.95 351175 A FARMERS TEL. CO.-BATAVIA 8.06 1.20 6.79 17.26 3 - 186 Table 3.32 High-Cost Loop
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-7.pdf
  • in Table 7.13. Both tables report historical averages for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. These LECs control over 98% of the industry's regulated access lines. Current per-line charges and per-minute charges are reported for each of the carriers in Tables 7.14 and 7.15, respectively. The averages in Table 7.13 clearly illustrate the effectiveness of access reform in reducing the prices long distance carriers pay per minute for access to the local telephone companies' networks. The reductions in per-minute access prices over time have been a major contributing factor to reductions in long distance prices. 5 Although the changes took effect on July 1,
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr03-intro.pdf
  • to 10-20 11. Revenues, Expenses and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line ................................................................... Table 7.12 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.14 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.13 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.15 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Service ........................... Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.37 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Changes ......................................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Changes - Telephone Components .................. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change ................................. Table 7.1 Consumer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr04-3.pdf
  • CAROLINA Cont. 240541 A RIDGEWAY TEL. CO., INC. 9.92 -1.58 11.68 0.00 240542 C ROCK HILL TEL. CO. 2.92 -3.55 6.71 185.22 240544 C ST. STEPHEN TEL. CO. 9.95 0.29 9.63 21.74 240546 A SANDHILL TEL. COOP., INC. 12.47 3.76 8.39 0.00 240550 C WEST CAROLINA RURAL TEL. COOP. 6.86 -3.64 10.90 16.70 240551 C WILLISTON TEL. CO. 6.83 -0.30 7.15 13.28 245194 C SOUTHERN BELL-SC 0.13 -2.59 2.79 0.00 SOUTH DAKOTA Total 3.23 -4.17 7.72 9.37 391640 A ARMOUR INDEPENDENT TELEPHONE CO. 9.76 2.53 7.05 20.73 391642 A ALLIANCE COMMUNICATIONS COOP., INC. (BALTIC) 7.82 -1.57 9.53 31.87 391647 C CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBAL TEL AUTH 3.06 2.58 0.47 -0.56 391649 A BERESFORD MUNICIPAL TEL. CO. 14.59 4.35 9.82 116.19 391650
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-0.pdf
  • 9-1 to 9-27 10. Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 10-1 to 10-25 11. Revenues, Expenses and Investment............................................................. 11-1 to 11-31 1 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Per Line ................................................................................. Table 7.12 Access Charges - Per Line - By Carrier ............................................................. Table 7.14 Access Charges - Per Minute .............................................................................. Table 7.13 Access Charges - Per Minute - By Carrier ......................................................... Table 7.15 Consumer Price Indexes - Average Annual Changes ..........................................Table 7.1 Consumer Price Indexes - Monthly ..................................................................... Table 7.4 Consumer Price Indexes - Monthly - New ......................................................... Table 7.5 Customer Perception Surveys - Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied ...............Table 9.4 Customer Perception Surveys - Sample Sizes ..................................................... Table 9.5 DEM Weighting Factors ..................................................................................... Table 3.6 Dial Equipment Minute (DEM) Factors .............................................................. Table 8.19
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-7.pdf
  • in Table 7.13. Both tables report historical averages for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. These LECs control over 98% of the industry's regulated access lines. Current per-line charges and per-minute charges are reported for each of the carriers in Tables 7.14 and 7.15, respectively. The averages in Table 7.13 clearly illustrate the effectiveness of access reform in reducing the prices long distance carriers pay per minute for access to the local telephone companies' networks. Per-minute access prices have continually decreased over time, a trend that continues with implementation of the 1997 reforms. 7 - 4 TABLE 7.1 LONG-TERM CHANGES FOR VARIOUS PRICE INDEXES
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mr98-9.pdf
  • 5.83 5.33 7.31 Small Business 8.20 6.48 3.47 20.53 4.54 6.89 11.31 13.39 Large Business 9.38 11.36 NA 23.42 7.42 11.21 23.00 0.74 Repairs:Residential 9.55 20.69 8.72 27.33 7.41 8.44 10.50 13.43 Small Business 10.88 9.20 4.32 23.37 7.61 6.57 12.80 14.11 Large Business 11.83 13.17 NA 30.07 7.93 7.94 22.00 1.61 Business Office: Residential 5.94 11.17 5.21 18.90 2.07 7.15 2.17 1.88 Small Business 6.02 5.22 2.31 15.86 4.02 6.64 3.56 4.70 Large Business 13.37 9.79 NA 12.51 2.70 13.78 9.00 0.00 9 - 23 Table 9.4(c): Company Comparision -- Customer Perception Surveys -- 1997 Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Company AmeritechBell AtlanticBellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Installations: Residential 5.52 3.11 5.73 11.54 4.00 5.52 4.86 7.77 Small Business
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrd99-9.pdf
  • 6.11 2.65 6.64 2.16 Small Business 6.21 6.18 5.04 5.93 5.55 Large Business 5.75 4.15 7.10 15.41 0.00 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 22 Table 9.4(c): Company Comparision -- 1998 Customer Perception Surveys Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Installations: Residential 7.71 3.86 6.84 4.42 7.15 4.98 4.77 7.39 Small Business 10.83 7.05 7.18 8.13 9.86 6.43 11.97 13.14 Large Business 10.77 11.04 3.88 7.88 8.33 6.28 NA 4.06 Repairs: Residential 12.39 12.28 10.19 12.69 15.57 7.59 7.65 11.00 Small Business 11.71 10.46 8.30 11.43 9.72 5.95 8.54 12.52 Large Business 12.60 14.58 5.38 13.25 9.57 8.03 NA 2.49 Business Office: Residential 8.91 5.35 7.60 6.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-0.pdf
  • Indexes ............................................................................... 7-1 to 7-27 8. Network Usage and Growth ........................................................................ 8-1 to 8-237 9. Quality of Service ........................................................................................ 9-1 to 9-16 10. Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 10-1 to 10-24 11. Revenues, Expenses and Investment............................................................. 11-1 to 11-31 1 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Per Line ................................................................................. Table 7.13 Access Charges - Per Line - By Carrier ............................................................. Table 7.15 Access Charges - Per Minute .............................................................................. Table 7.14 Access Charges - Per Minute - By Carrier ......................................................... Table 7.16 Consumer Price Indexes - Annual Levels ........................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indexes - Annual Rates of Change ........................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indexes - Annual Rates of Change - Components ....................Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indexes - Average Annual Changes ..........................................Table 7.1
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-7.pdf
  • are shown in Table 7.14. Both tables report historical averages for all local exchange carriers (LECs) that file access tariffs subject to price-cap regulation and LECs in the National Exchange Carrier Association (NECA) pool. These LECs control over 98% of the industry's regulated access lines. Current per-line charges and per-minute charges are reported for each of the carriers in Tables 7.15 and 7.16, respectively. The averages in Table 7.14 clearly illustrate the effectiveness of access reform in reducing the prices long distance carriers pay per minute for access to the local telephone companies' networks. Per-minute access prices have continually decreased over time, a trend that continues with implementation of the 1997 reforms. 7 - 4 TABLE 7.1 LONG-TERM CHANGES FOR VARIOUS
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrj99-9.pdf
  • 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 15. Other/Unknown 0.0 1.8 0.0 919.8 5.6 0.0 388.7 0.0 135.9 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications 9 - 14 Table 9.4: Company Comparision -- 1998 Customer Perception Surveys Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEXPacific SBCUS West GTE Percentage of Customers Dissatisfied Installations: Residential 7.71 3.86 6.84 4.42 7.15 4.98 4.77 7.39 Small Business 10.83 7.05 7.18 8.13 9.86 6.43 11.97 13.14 Large Business 10.77 11.04 3.88 7.88 8.33 6.28 NA 4.06 Repairs:Residential 12.39 12.28 10.19 12.69 15.57 7.59 7.65 11.00 Small Business 11.71 10.46 8.30 11.43 9.72 5.95 8.54 12.52 Large Business 12.60 14.58 5.38 13.25 9.57 8.03 NA 2.49 Business Office: Residential 8.91 5.35 7.60 6.76 6.76
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs00-0.pdf
  • 8. Network Usage and Growth ........................................................................ 8-1 to 8-114 9. Quality of Service ........................................................................................ 9-1 to 9-15 10. Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 10-1 to 10-23 11. Revenues, Expenses and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Per Line ......................................................................................Table 7.14 Access Charges - Per Line - By Carrier ..................................................................Table 7.16 Access Charges - Per Minute ..................................................................................Table 7.15 Access Charges - Per Minute - By Carrier ..............................................................Table 7.17 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Levels ............................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Rates of Change ............................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Rates of Change - Components ....................... Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Changes ............................................. Table 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Monthly ........................................................................Table 7.4
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs01-0.pdf
  • 8-1 to 8-140 9. Quality of Service ........................................................................................ 9-1 to 9-15 10. Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 10-1 to 10-21 11. Revenues, Expenses and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-54 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line ...................................................................Table 7.14 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................Table 7.16 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.15 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier ..............................................Table 7.17 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.33 Consumer Price Indices - Levels .........................................................................Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Changes .........................................................Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Changes - Telephone Components .................. Chart 7.3 Consumer Price Indices - Average Annual Rates of Change ................................. Table 7.1 Consumer
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/Monitor/mrs02-0.pdf
  • 8-140 9. Quality of Service ........................................................................................ 9-1 to 9-14 10. Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 10-1 to 10-20 11. Revenues, Expenses and Investment........................................................... 11-1 to 11-28 2 Index of Tables and Charts Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line ................................................................... Table 7.14 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Line - by Carrier ................................................ Table 7.16 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute ................................................................Table 7.15 Access Charges - Interstate - Per Minute - by Carrier .............................................. Table 7.17 Carrier Telecommunications Revenues by Type of Service ........................... Table 1.9 Changes in Local Exchange Carriers ..................................................... Table 3.38 Consumer Price Indices - Levels ......................................................................... Chart 7.1 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Changes ......................................................... Chart 7.2 Consumer Price Indices - Annual Changes - Telephone Components .................. Chart 7.3
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/QualSvc/qual98.pdf
  • 5.37 7.53 Small Business 8.20 6.48 3.47 20.53 4.54 6.89 11.58 14.23 Large Business 9.38 11.36 NA 23.42 7.42 11.21 NA 1.18 Repairs: Residential 9.55 20.69 8.72 27.33 7.41 8.44 10.66 12.83 Small Business 10.88 9.20 4.32 23.37 7.61 6.57 12.92 13.86 Large Business 11.83 13.17 NA 30.07 7.93 7.94 NA 1.32 Business Office: Residential 5.94 11.17 5.21 18.90 2.07 7.15 2.23 2.08 Small Business 6.02 5.22 2.31 15.86 4.02 6.64 3.59 4.62 Large Business 13.37 9.79 NA 12.51 2.70 13.78 NA 0.26 Please refer to text for notes and data qualifications Table 1(e): Company Comparision -- 1996 Customer Perception Surveys Company Ameritech Bell Atlantic BellSouth NYNEX Pacific SBC US West GTE Sample Sizes -- Customer Perception Surveys Overall: Residential 7,269
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Reports/FCC-State_Link/SOCC/96socc.pdf
  • 5.18 11.31% 8BELL ATLANTIC - NEW JERSEY, INC. 35.10% 64.90% 7.28 5.07 10.79% 9BELL ATLANTIC - PENNSYLVANIA INC. 38.40% 61.60% 6.57 4.29 9.31% 10BELL ATLANTIC - VIRGINIA, INC. 43.38% 56.62% 7.16 4.90 11.18% 11BELL ATLANTIC - WASHINGTON, D.C., INC. 37.02% 62.98% 4.85 3.39 7.51% 12BELL ATLANTIC - WEST VIRGINIA, INC. 41.55% 58.45% 7.76 5.14 11.02% 13BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. 37.88% 62.12% 7.15 4.90 10.74% NYNEX CORPORATION: 14NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. 38.36% 61.64% 8.37 5.56 11.90% 15NEW YORK TELEPHONE CO. 44.88% 55.12% 4.30 3.23 8.21% PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP: 16NEVADA BELL 31.41% 68.59% 5.25 3.92 10.53% 17PACIFIC BELL 40.79% 59.21% 5.32 4.06 8.00% 18SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. 38.35% 61.65% 6.15 4.42 10.17% 19U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 40.63% 59.37% 4.49 3.20 7.17%
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1999/fcc99136.pdf
  • 9.49 31 99.70 40 9.49 31 Urban Comm. PCS (PK) 3.47 4.42 7.89 32 148.28 31 7.89 32 21st Cent. Telesis (PK) 4.32 3.51 7.83 33 99.83 39 7.83 33 Radiofone 2.19 5.22 7.41 34 106.98 38 7.41 34 Pocket Comm. 7.33 7.33 35 109.89 37 7.33 35 Magnacom (PK) 1.77 5.47 7.23 36 81.17 43 7.23 36 McLeod, Inc. 7.15 7.15 37 71.47 46 7.15 37 Puerto Rico Telephone (9) 3.52 3.52 7.04 38 123.27 35 3.52 46 Vanguard Cellular 6.80 6.80 39 170.11 30 6.80 38 Chase Telecom 6.16 6.16 40 184.89 27 6.16 39 American Cellular 5.17 5.17 41 129.35 33 5.17 40 Clearcomm 5.12 5.12 42 76.78 45 5.12 41 Poka Lambro (PK) 0.06 1.34 3.29 4.69
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/aol-tw/tseng_comment051100.pdf
  • 2000 Scenario PPPoE 3 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% *High* Percentage of 20.0% 1.27 $ 1.59 $ 1.91 $ 2.23 $ 2.55 $ 2.87 $ (Portland) Subscribers 50.0% 2.58 $ 3.23 $ 3.88 $ 4.52 $ 5.17 $ 5.82 $ On-Line 80.0% 3.90 $ 4.87 $ 5.84 $ 6.82 $ 7.79 $ 8.76 $ 100.0% 4.77 $ 5.96 $ 7.15 $ 8.35 $ 9.54 $ 10.73 $ Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Internet Cable Modem Penetration Rates Open Access Cable Network 29 Section 5. Conclusions Section 5.1. Technical Conclusions What is at stake in the open access debate is whether cable companies should be required to offer unaffiliated Internet Service Providers (ISPs) wholesale access and interconnection to their cable modem
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nbc-telemundo/exhibit6.pdf
  • under Environmental Laws to operate the Company Properties or the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries, and the Company and the Buyer shall cooperate, prior to Closing, to take all actions necessary to ensure that such permits and/or financial assurance, or the benefits of such permits and/or financial assurance, are fully transferred to Buyer on or before the Closing. 7.15 Environmental Review. (a) Buyer shall have access to the properties and records of the Company, and the Subsidiaries sufficient to conduct Phase I environmental reviews ("Environmental Reports") in order to assess the existence and extent of any environmental problems which may be present at any of the Company Properties. The Company shall permit Buyer or its representative at all reasonable
• http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-pacific/appli_att2exh4.pdf
  • 0.00 7.74 1.55 20.00 4.00 9.80 7.75 51.1 As % of Total Spectrum 0% 0% 15% 3% 39% 8% 19% 15% 515 530 15 San Francisco Total Spectrum (MHz) 0.75 0.00 7.48 1.55 20.00 400% 10.80 7.13 51.7 As % of Total Spectrum 1% 0% 14% 3% 39% 0.08 21% 14% 501 543 42 Detroit Total Spectrum (MHz) 0.25 0.00 7.15 1.55 20.00 4.00 1.00 5.75 39.7 As % of Total Spectrum 1% 0% 18% 4% 50% 10% 3% 14% 657 680 23 Dallas Total Spectrum (MHz) 0.50 0.00 8.73 1.55 20.00 400% 6.60 7.50 48.9 As % of Total Spectrum 1% 0% 18% 3% 41% 0.08 14% 15% 585 622 37 Philadelphia Total Spectrum (MHz) 0.75 0.00 8.21 1.55 20.00