FCC Web Documents citing 15.11

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2010 08 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2764A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2764A1.txt
  • 20554 and provide a courtesy copy to Alex Roytblat, FCC WRC-03 Director, Room 6-B505. Comments should refer to specific preliminary views by document number. The deadline for comments on the preliminary views, draft proposals and NTIA letters is December 14, 2001. 2 I.Informal Working Group 6: Public Protection and Other Issues DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR THE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE Doc. WAC/075(15.11.01) WRC-2003 Agenda Item 1.7: to consider issues concerning the amateur and amateur-satellite services: ISSUES: 1.7.1possible revision of Article S25; BACKGROUND: Agenda Item 1.7.1. At WRC-95, one administration proposed to delete from Article S25 the requirement that amateurs demonstrate Morse code capability to be licensed to operate on frequencies below 30 MHz. Instead, a review of Article S25 was placed on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1658A1.txt
  • operation of existing products. We see no benefits in requiring halting the operation of GPRs and wall imaging systems that already are in the hands of the public and may have been used for several years without causing harmful interference. Accordingly, we are providing a blanket waiver of the Part 15 regulations, with the exception of 47 C.F.R. §§ 15.5(a)-(c), 15.11, 15.29, 15.521(a) and 15.525, for existing GPRs and wall imaging systems. This waiver applies only to those entities that are eligible to operate GPRs and wall imaging systems, as described later in this order under the discussion on ``Operating Restrictions,'' and that have registered their equipment with us, following the procedures shown below. To be included under this blanket waiver,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-54A1.txt
  • 1,438,580 1,962,008 73% 2709 2832206.76 14 Salisbury, MD-DE-VA 296,424 405,167 73% 5263 5018111.17 91 Fort Smith, AR-OK 252,934 346,163 73% 4114 4053 46.51 140 Pueblo, CO-NM 210,769 289,294 73% 2646 2583 8.71 104 Madison, WI-IA-IL 720,379 996,238 72% 3530 3515 71.33 117 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 179,224 248,545 72% 4025 3911 39.51 116 Sioux Falls, SD-IA-MN-NE 394,386 549,186 72% 4288 4174 15.11 4 Burlington, VT-NY 443,543 619,733 72% 4776 4893 57.62 9 State College, PA 571,149 799,734 71% 4238 4152 92.41 162 Fresno, CA 1,152,858 1,616,289 71% 2932 2988 98.64 129 San Angelo, TX 145,888 205,600 71% 2464 3290 10.05 61 Traverse City, MI 213,446 300,996 71% 4178 4390 50.67 146 Missoula, MT 305,627 431,128 71% 6043 5276 10.79 110 Grand Forks,
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A1.txt
  • Commitments State/Territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 739,678 $25,655,426 $34.68 $17,960,621 $24.28 $7,694,805 $10.40 Alaska 134,364 14,122,989 105.11 11,752,514 87.47 2,370,475 17.64 American Samoa 15,984 2,592,663 162.20 2,474,057 154.78 118,606 7.42 Arizona 937,755 45,873,336 48.92 28,535,596 30.43 17,337,740 18.49 Arkansas 450,985 21,034,455 46.64 13,957,334 30.95 7,077,121 15.69 California 6,356,348 236,467,838 37.20 140,405,625 22.09 96,062,213 15.11 Colorado 751,862 23,828,485 31.69 20,097,925 26.73 3,730,560 4.96 Connecticut 570,023 24,547,609 43.06 20,054,533 35.18 4,493,076 7.88 Delaware 116,342 1,682,222 14.46 999,849 8.59 682,373 5.87 Dist. of Columbia 76,166 41,549,214 545.51 6,217,960 81.64 35,331,254 463.87 Florida 2,539,929 54,075,099 21.29 41,457,503 16.32 12,617,596 4.97 Georgia 1,496,012 59,064,093 39.48 44,981,307 30.07 14,082,786 9.41 Guam 31,992 1,976,462 61.78 828,879 25.91 1,147,583 35.87 Hawaii 183,829
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-262986A6.txt
  • Commitments State/Territory Schools1 Committed per Student Disbursed per Student Commitments per Student Alabama 739,678 $25,655,426 $34.68 $17,960,621 $24.28 $7,694,805 $10.40 Alaska 134,364 14,122,989 105.11 11,752,514 87.47 2,370,475 17.64 American Samoa 15,984 2,592,663 162.20 2,474,057 154.78 118,606 7.42 Arizona 937,755 45,873,336 48.92 28,535,596 30.43 17,337,740 18.49 Arkansas 450,985 21,034,455 46.64 13,957,334 30.95 7,077,121 15.69 California 6,356,348 236,467,838 37.20 140,405,625 22.09 96,062,213 15.11 Colorado 751,862 23,828,485 31.69 20,097,925 26.73 3,730,560 4.96 Connecticut 570,023 24,547,609 43.06 20,054,533 35.18 4,493,076 7.88 Delaware 116,342 1,682,222 14.46 999,849 8.59 682,373 5.87 Dist. of Columbia 76,166 41,549,214 545.51 6,217,960 81.64 35,331,254 463.87 Florida 2,539,929 54,075,099 21.29 41,457,503 16.32 12,617,596 4.97 Georgia 1,496,012 59,064,093 39.48 44,981,307 30.07 14,082,786 9.41 Guam 31,992 1,976,462 61.78 828,879 25.91 1,147,583 35.87 Hawaii 183,829
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • - Pacific Telesis - Pacific Bell - California CA 3,565,879 2,443,513 1,457,990 40.89 27.28 SureWest Telephone CA 141,518 101,909 40,545 28.65 37.69 Qwest - Colorado CO 2,262,408 1,700,563 596,081 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • - Pacific Telesis - Pacific Bell - California CA 3,565,879 2,443,513 1,457,990 40.89 27.28 SureWest Telephone CA 141,518 101,909 40,545 28.65 37.69 Qwest - Colorado CO 2,262,408 1,700,563 596,081 26.35 7.66 AT&T - Southern New England Telephone CT 994,978 706,299 371,715 37.36 1.35 Verizon Delaware, LLC DE 376,685 267,522 119,563 31.74 1.69 Verizon Washington, D.C. DC 381,974 219,874 185,102 48.46 15.11 Verizon Florida, LLC FL 1,399,560 1,048,487 425,891 30.43 5.80 AT&T - BellSouth - Florida FL 3,142,605 2,345,910 1,065,150 33.89 14.92 Embarq - Florida FL 1,551,382 1,238,530 323,424 20.85 5.84 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 287,449 203,859 85,085 29.60 40.77 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 3,347,853 2,363,437 1,188,932 35.51 9.02 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 78,556 56,328 29,464 37.51 5.00
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-293258A2.txt
  • of December 31, 2008 Incumbent LECs and CLECs Cellular/PCS Pooled Thousands-Total Thousands-Percent of total blocksPooled Thousands-Total Thousands-Percent of total blocks State blocks blocks reported1 that are pooled blocks blocks reported1 that are pooled Alabama 1,014 10,553 9.61 1,841 8,224 22.39 Alaska 0 961 0.00 31 489 6.34 Arizona 1,493 11,531 12.95 2,202 7,026 31.34 Arkansas 665 5,842 11.38 612 4,049 15.11 California 13,426 95,195 14.10 16,360 45,495 35.96 Colorado 1,636 12,637 12.95 1,454 5,910 24.60 Connecticut 1,387 10,288 13.48 1,426 4,099 34.79 Delaware 464 3,332 13.93 392 1,086 36.10 District of Columbia 407 3,974 10.24 563 1,406 40.04 Florida 6,228 40,678 15.31 7,246 24,079 30.09 Georgia 2,179 21,258 10.25 2,885 12,515 23.05 Guam 0 0 NM 0 0 NM Hawaii 146
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-216A1.txt
  • 491,964 921,086 53.41% 1816 49.30% 20.89 122 Wichita, KS-OK 565,858 1,175,577 48.13% 1948 35.42% 20.49 128 Abilene, TX 95,681 222,147 43.07% 3472 36.13% 20.35 109 Duluth-Superior, MN-WI 158,866 350,059 45.38% 3694 41.64% 18.53 113 Fargo-Moorhead, ND-MN 182,726 371,691 49.16% 2769 43.48% 16.40 155 Farmington, NM-CO 97,146 193,872 50.11% 5371 44.55% 16.04 116 Sioux Falls, SD-IA-MN-NE 264,570 519,143 50.96% 3448 46.49% 15.11 165 Redding, CA-OR 160,583 336,820 47.68% 2184 41.01% 14.36 149 Twin Falls, ID 84,477 162,397 52.02% 2448 43.96% 14.08 150 Boise City, ID-OR 304,405 574,876 52.95% 2285 47.64% 13.69 139 Santa Fe, NM 126,983 258,790 49.07% 2855 44.21% 13.06 126 Western Oklahoma, OK 64,654 139,761 46.26% 3032 41.54% 12.04 138 Amarillo, TX-NM 233,841 481,633 48.55% 1579 44.91% 11.79 120 Grand
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-10-81A1.txt
  • 3442 3530 71.33 117 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 192,264 248,114 77% 4240 4025 39.51 148 Idaho Falls, ID-WY 271,012 350,332 77% 4361 2388 10.85 149 Twin Falls, ID 135,160 176,400 77% 4175 2232 14.08 165 Redding, CA-OR 279,110 361,915 77% 2888 2273 14.36 1 Bangor, ME 408,137 533,602 76% 4250 4365 20.94 116 Sioux Falls, SD-IA-MN-NE 420,355 554,970 76% 5179 4288 15.11 162 Fresno, CA 1,233,651 1,633,280 76% 2962 2932 98.64 92 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO-OK 378,621 506,212 75% 4729 4629 88.43 113 Fargo-Moorhead, ND-MN 288,111 384,153 75% 4313 3286 16.4 115 Rapid City, SD-MT-ND-NE 165,888 224,401 74% 5140 4952 5.04 54 Erie, PA 371,032 509,551 73% 4241 4120 116.41 168 Pendleton, OR-WA 144,625 204,130 71% 2894 2150 8.67 76 Greenville, MS 158,768 226,125
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Notices/1999/fcc99122.wp
  • ten percent of the total NXX code assignments are allocated to paging carriers. Number Utilization Study at 7. 306 See Telephone Number Portability, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket No. 95-116, 10 FCC Rcd 12350, 12369-70 (1995) for a further description of DID. See also DICTIONARY OF PC HARDWARE AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS TERMS at . 307 NANC Report at § 15.11. 308 See Colorado Telephone Numbering Task Force Report at § 5.7.1. See also letter from James U. Troup, Counsel for Bay Springs Telephone Company, Inc., Roanoke Telephone Company, Inc., National Telephone Company of Alabama, Inc., Crockett Telephone Company, Inc., Peoples Telephone Company, Inc., and West Tennessee Telephone Company, Inc., to Lawrence Strickling, FCC, dated Oct. 27, 1998, at 4 n.8,
• http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/roundtable_docs/waldfogel-a.pdf
  • (8) MSA White Pop ( 1) 0.0086 0.0085 0.0116 0.0085 0.0136 0.0095 0.0059 0.0093 (5.68)** (5.06)** (2.57)* (4.91)** (3.63)** (2.44)* (3.30)** (2.26)* MSA Black Pop ( 2) 0.0025 -0.0004 0.0156 -0.0005 0.0133 0.0264 0.0106 0.0259 (0.32) (0.05) (0.74) (0.06) (0.71) (1.32) (1.18) (1.22) Zip Black Fr. -0.1367 -0.1120 -0.0931 -0.1990 -0.1556 -0.0942 -0.1068 -0.1014 (19.45)** (15.44)** (5.91)** (6.16)** (9.82)** (6.00)** (15.11)** (0.91) Zip Black Fr.* White Pop ( 1- 1) -0.0426 -0.0419 -0.0712 -0.0397 -0.0687 -0.0726 -0.0397 -0.0665 (6.11)** (5.95)** (3.58)** (4.54)** (3.17)** (3.44)** (5.81)** (2.34)* Zip Black Fr.* Black Pop ( 2- 2) 0.1505 0.1221 0.1724 0.1172 0.2258 0.1791 0.1075 0.1755 (4.99)** (4.05)** (1.84) (3.18)** (2.21)* (1.80) (3.70)** (1.24) MSA Median Inc. (000) 0.002 -0.0009 (2.04)* (1.97)* MSA Fr. College