FCC Web Documents citing 74.13

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2008 08 01

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1285A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1285A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-1285A1.txt
  • 17.91% 2047 366.72 Lexington (Village) OH0789 17.12% 1626 278.33 Limaville OH2271 17.91% 71 12.72 Lisbon OH0070 36.88% 1133 417.83 Lodi OH0071 15.67% 1274 199.69 Louisville OH0063 19.81% 3444 682.15 Lowellville OH1498 28.01% 520 145.64 Lucas OH0605 50.33% 246 123.81 Malvern OH0326, 23.28% 530 123.40 OH0348 OH0326 Marlboro OH1622 18.57% 1452 269.69 Midvale OH0299 23.63% 213 50.33 Mifflin OH2187 17.28% 429 74.13 Mifflin OH2101 32.39% 64 20.73 Milan OH0191 15.15% 1321 200.14 Milan OH0872 24.14% 540 130.37 Millersburg OH0079 29.41% 1213 356.74 Milton OH1492 26.34% 1606 423.07 Mineral City OH0349 44.55% 306 136.32 Minerva OH0168 45.64% 1603 731.62 Mogadore OH0773 21.38% 1485 317.46 Monroe OH2188 34.91% 1776 620.05 Monroeville OH0036 39.74% 523 207.85 Nashville OH2194 50.24% 68 34.16 New Franklin OH2599 19.16%
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A1.txt
  • Florida FL 114,828 37,624 77,204 67.23 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 43,880 32,041 11,825 26.95 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 216,512 129,462 87,091 40.22 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 10,409 927 8,912 85.62 Qwest - Idaho South ID 50,317 23,522 26,797 53.26 Qwest - Idaho North ID 3,635 1,814 1,821 50.10 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 9,126 2,357 6,765 74.13 Verizon South - Illinois IL (187) (417) 229 (122.46) Verizon North - Illinois IL 31,242 5,200 26,027 83.31 AT&T - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL 373,060 213,609 157,712 42.28 Verizon North - Contel/Indiana IN 19,613 8,695 10,911 55.63 Verizon North - Indiana IN 48,351 4,920 43,411 89.78 AT&T - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN 127,300 69,620 57,157 44.90 Embarq -
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-279226A13.txt
  • Florida FL 114,828 37,624 77,204 67.23 Windstream Georgia Communications GA 43,880 32,041 11,825 26.95 AT&T - BellSouth - Georgia GA 216,512 129,462 87,091 40.22 Verizon - Northwest - Idaho ID 10,409 927 8,912 85.62 Qwest - Idaho South ID 50,317 23,522 26,797 53.26 Qwest - Idaho North ID 3,635 1,814 1,821 50.10 Verizon North - Contel/Illinois IL 9,126 2,357 6,765 74.13 Verizon South - Illinois IL (187) (417) 229 (122.46) Verizon North - Illinois IL 31,242 5,200 26,027 83.31 AT&T - Ameritech - Illinois Bell IL 373,060 213,609 157,712 42.28 Verizon North - Contel/Indiana IN 19,613 8,695 10,911 55.63 Verizon North - Indiana IN 48,351 4,920 43,411 89.78 AT&T - Ameritech - Indiana Bell IN 127,300 69,620 57,157 44.90 Embarq -
• http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/Mass_Media/Databases/documents_collection/da92-1547.pdf
  • FCCRcdNo.25 4,Atnotimepriortothegrantoftheconstruction permitapplicationdidWKFMinterposeanobjection,Consequently, WKFM'spetitionseeksreconsiderationofaction takeninaproceedingtowhichitwasnotaparty,Inorder todemonstratestandingtofileitspetition.WKFMstates thatitsinterestswouldbeadverselyaffectedbythegrant "becauseoftheinterferencethatwouldhecausedtothe receptionofitsfacilitiesbyForus'boosterstation.More- over.WKFMsubmitsthatithadnotparticipatedearlier becausetheSeptember20,1989PublicNoticeannouncing theapplicationastenderedforfiling(ReportNo,14559), listedonlytheproposedtransmitteroutputpowerof2.5 kW,asopposedtotheproposedeffectiveradiatedpower ("ERP")of8kW,WKFMmaintainsthatifithadbeen informedthattheproposedboosterstationwouldoperate withfacilitiesgreaterthanaClassAFMstation,itwould havetimelyfiledapetitiontodenytheapplication, 5,WefindthatWKFMhasfailedtoestablishgoodcause fornotparticipatingearlierintheproceeding,Hence,it lackstherequisitestandingtofileapetitionforreconsideration ofthegrantoftheForusapplication.AllCommis- sionpublicnoticesannouncingthetenderofFMbooster stationsspecifytheproposedtransmitteroutputpowerand nottheERP.Fromthisnotice.interestedpartiesare chargedwithconstructivenoticeofthesubjectapplication. This,coupledwiththefactthatthepublicnoticespecified Syracuseastheproposedcommunityoflicenseforthe boosterstation,meantthatWKFM,by theexerciseof reasonablediligence.couldhavedeterminedthefactsrelating totheproposedstation'spowerandtheeffectitwould haveontheoperationofWKFM.SeeHighCountryCommunications, 4FCCRcd6237,n,2.(1989):SeealsoRivoli RealityCo.,27FCC2d1004(1971). 6,Accordingly.theWKFMpetitionwillbedismissed, However,becauseoftheeventsfollowinggrantofthe booster,wewillconsideronourownmotionthepolicy questionspresentedandtheappropriateactiontotakein suchasituation. BACKGROUND 7,Whilethepetitionforreconsiderationwaspending. Foruscommencedequipmenttestoperationofthebooster stationonMarch15.1990,3OnMarch16.1990,WKFM requestedthattheboosterbeorderedtoceaseoperation, pursuantto§74,1203.becauseitsoperationwascausing "destructive"interferencetothereceptionofWKFM'ssignal withinits1mV/'mservicearea,Consequently.Forus wasdirectedtoterminateoperations,Believingthatthe interferencewasaonetimeoccurrence.Forusresumed operationsonMarch23,1990,WKFM,by letterofthat samedate,againcomplainedthatthebooster'soperation wascausing"destructive"interferencetothereceptionof tinentpart,thatanauthorizedFMboosterstation"willnotbe permittedtocontinuetooperateifitcausesanyactualinterference to:...thetransmissionofanyauthorizedbroadcaststation; or...thedirectreceptionbythepublicoftheoff-the-airsignals ofanyauthorizedbroadcaststation...."47C.F.R.§74,1203(a) 1991), 3Equipmenttestsareauthorizedby47C.F.R.§74.13,and maybecontinuedaslongastheconstructionpermitshall 7FCCRcdNo.25 WKFM.°TheChiefoftheAuxiliaryServicesBranchdirected Forustodiscontinueoperationoftheboosterstation pendingresolutionofthismatter. 8.Thepartiessubsequentlyagreedtoconductjointlistening teststodeterminetheeffectoftheboosterstation's operationonWKFM'sreceptioninSyracuse.Thelistening tests.whichwereconductedonApril10,1990.covered eightmutuallyagreeduponpointsintheSyracusearea.At theconclusionofthetesting.theamountandthetypeof interferenceremainedindispute.However.bothparties agreedthatinterferencehadresultedfromoperationofthe boosterstation.Forusconcludedthatbasedonthelocation oftheinterference(thetwotestpointsclosesttothetransmitting site).itshouldhaveanopportunitytorectifyany complaintsanditexpressedawillingnesstoresolvecomplaints byprovidingnewreceiversorbyrepositioning and/orreorientingtheantennasofaffectedreceivers. WKFMcontendedthatitssignalwouldreceiveactualoff-the-airinterferenceasaresultofthebooster'soperationat sixoftheeighttestsitesandthatitdetectedintermediate frequency("IF")interferenceattwoofthesites. 9.Tofurtherfacilitateresolutionofthiscase.theparties andtheirrepresentativesmetwithCommissionstaffon December13.1990.Asaresultofthismeeting,itwas agreedthatForuswouldbepermittedtocommenceopera- tionpursuanttospecialtemporaryauthority("STA")in ordertodetermineiflistenercomplaintswouldresultfrom thebooster'soperationand.ifso,todetermineForus' abilitytoresolvesuchcomplaints.TheSTAwasissuedon February20.1991.andranthroughApril25.1991.Thereafter .bothpartiesweretosubmitreportsandreplycomments ontheresultsoftheSTAoperation.OnApril22. 1991.ForusrequestedanindefiniteextensionoftheSTA. WKFMobjectedtotheextensionnotingthatthetemporary operationresultedinunresolvedlistenercomplaints.More specifically,WKFMarguedthatinterferencehadbeenreceived bymobilereceiversandthat.sincesuchlisteners constitutedasignificantportionofitsradiostation'slisteningaudience.thisinterferencecouldnotbeignored.Forus reiterateditsintenttoresolvealloutstandingcomplaints. WedeniedForus'requestforanextensionofitsoperating authorityonApril25.1991.sothatwecouldhavean opportunitytoanalyzetheSTAresultswithoutthepotential forfurthercomplaints. CONTENTIONSOFTHEPARTIES 10.BothForusandWKFMfiledreportsandreplycomments ontheresultsoftheSTAoperation.WKFM reportedthatithadforwarded48listenercomplaintsinvolving 51radioreceiverstoForusforresolution.Ofthe 48complaintsreceived.19requiredresolutionand29required nofurtheractionbecausethecomplaintswereei- thernotboosterrelatedorassistancewasdeclined.Sixof the19complaintsrequiringresolutionremainunresolved. These sixcomplaintsallinvolvemobilereceivers. 11.Forusattributestheremainingunresolvedcomplaints ofinterferencetoFrontEndReceiverOverload("FERO"). Itsuggeststhattheobligationstosatisfyallinterference complaintsimposeduponpermitteesforFMboostersta- remainvalid.