FCC Web Documents citing 76.630

as compiled by hallikainen.com/FccRules on 2012 01 01

• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.pdf
  • Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband (``Bend Broadband'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.pdf
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cablevision Systems Corp. (``Cablevision'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.pdf
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.pdf
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cox Communications (``Cox'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.pdf
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to GCI, Inc. (``GCI'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.pdf
  • November 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Harron Entertainment Company (``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. (``Midcontinent'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.pdf
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to RCN Corporation (``RCN'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. (``Suddenlink'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.pdf
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.pdf
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Verizon Communications (``Verizon'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.pdf
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Charter Communications, Inc. (``Charter'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2475A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2475A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2475A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit . Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: Waitsfield Cable Company Petition for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) Basic Tier Scrambling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 4394-Z Adopted: October 23, 2001 Released: October 25, 2001 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION In the above-captioned proceeding, Waitsfield Cable Company (``Waitsfield''), filed a petition for special relief requesting waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules. Section 76.630(a) provides that "[c]able systems shall not scramble or
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2755A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2755A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-2755A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit �qB� � Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: Caribbean Communications Corporation Petition for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) Basic Tier Scrambling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 4393-Z Adopted: November 21, 2001 Released: November 30, 2001 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION In the above-captioned proceeding, Caribbean Communications Corporation, d/b/a/ St. Thomas - St. John Cable TV (``Caribbean''), filed a petition for special relief requesting waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules. Section 76.630(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-577A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-577A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-577A1.txt
  • Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. ***** Section 76.503 is amended by revising Note 1 to read as follows: � 76.503 National subscriber limits. ***** Note 1 to � 76.503: Certifications made under this section shall be sent to the attention of the Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. ***** Section 76.630 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: � 76.630 Compatibility with consumer electronics equipment. (a) Cable system operators shall not scramble or otherwise encrypt signals carried on the basic service tier. Requests for waivers of this prohibition must demonstrate either a substantial problem with theft of basic tier service or a strong need to scramble basic signals
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1200A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1200A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1200A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: Centennial Puerto Rico Cable TV Corp. Petition for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) Basic Tier Scrambling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5967-Z Adopted: April 17, 2003 Released: April 24, 2003 By the Deputy Chief, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION In the above-captioned proceeding, Centennial Puerto Rico Cable TV Corp. (``Centennial'') filed a petition for special relief requesting waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules. Section 76.630(a) provides that "[c]able systems shall
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-177A1.txt
  • Mississippi, 10 FCC Rcd 8728 (CSB 1995) (The Bureau concluded that neither signal quality issues nor concerns about equipment compatibility may be remedied through application of the Commission's rate regulations. Rather, signal quality is subject to the Commission's rules of technical standards (47 C.F.R. �� 76.601-630) and equipment-related problems are addressed by the Commission's equipment compatibility rules (47 C.F.R. � 76.630). The Order noted that a franchising authority may not arbitrarily reduce prices for programming and equipment below maximum permitted rate levels in an effort to address signal quality or equipment compatibility issues). 13 FCC Rcd 11996, 11998 (CSB 1998). 47 C.F.R. � 76.936; Rate Order, 8 FCC Rcd at 5715-16. See 47 C.F.R. �� 76.601-630. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.309.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2488A1.txt
  • Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband (``Bend Broadband'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2489A1.txt
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Bright House Networks, LLC (``Bright House'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2490A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cablevision Systems Corp. (``Cablevision'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2491A1.txt
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Comcast Corporation (``Comcast'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2492A1.txt
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Cox Communications (``Cox'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2493A1.txt
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to GCI, Inc. (``GCI'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2494A1.txt
  • November 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Harron Entertainment Company (``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2495A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. (``Midcontinent'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2496A1.txt
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to RCN Corporation (``RCN'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2497A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. (``Suddenlink'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2498A1.txt
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Time Warner Cable, Inc. (``TWC'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2499A1.txt
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Verizon Communications (``Verizon'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-08-2500A1.txt
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau (``Bureau'') sent a Letter of Inquiry (``LOI'') to Charter Communications, Inc. (``Charter'' or ``Company'') seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (``Act'') and the Commission's rules (``Rules''), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. �543 and 47 C.F.R. ��76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an ``analog-to-digital channel change''), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. Question 8.b.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2094A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2094A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2094A1.txt
  • September 23, 2009 MEDIA BUREAU ACTION MEDIA BUREAU SEEKS COMMENT ON CABLEVISION'S REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF THE PROHIBITION ON ENCRYPTION OF THE BASIC SERVICE TIER MB Docket No. 09-168 Comment Date: October 22, 2009 Reply Comment Date: November 6, 2009 Cablevision Systems Corporation (``Cablevision'') has filed a request pursuant to Section 76.7 of the Commission's rules for waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules with respect to its New York City franchise areas. Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules prohibits a cable operator from encrypting the Basic service tier. The Basic service tier contains local broadcast stations and Public, Educational, and Government access channels, and may contain other cable programming. Cablevision's request describes its plans to convert its New York
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2386A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2386A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2386A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Cablevision Systems Corporation Request for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) ) MB Docket No. 09-168 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: November 5, 2009 Released: November 5, 2009 Reply Comment Date: November 16, 2009 By the Chief, Media Bureau: In this Order, we waive in part, sua sponte, our September 23, 2009 Public Notice in this proceeding and Section 76.7(b)(1) and 76.7(c)(1)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-09-2399A1.txt
  • with disabilities by contacting the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 or (202) 418-7365 (TTY). For further information, contact Brendan Murray of the Media Bureau, (202) 418-2120. Press inquiries should be directed to Janice Wise, (202) 418-8165 or Janice.Wise@fcc.gov. TTY: (202) 418-7172 or (888) 835-5322. -FCC- 47 U.S.C. �� 549(a), 549(c). 47 C.F.R. � 76.7. 47 C.F.R. � 76.630(a). Waiver Request at 7-8. Id. at 8-9. Id. at 12. Id. at 8-9. Id. at 4-5 . Intel requests that the waiver be granted with respect to IP networking without specifying a connector. Id. at 1 n.3. Id. At 5. Id. at 5. Id. at 8. Id. at 13-15. Id. at 16. See 47 C.F.R. �� 1.1200-1.1216. 47 C.F.R. �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-34A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-34A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-34A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Cablevision Systems Corporation's Request for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's Rules ) ) ) ) ) MB Docket No. 09-168 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: January 8, 2010 Released: January 8, 2010 By the Chief, Media Bureau: INTRODUCTION Cablevision Systems Corporation (``Cablevision'') has filed the above-captioned request for waiver (the ``Waiver Request'') of the prohibition on encryption of the basic service tier set forth in Section 76.630(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1333A1.txt
  • the technical standards of this subpart and shall ensure that their systems are compatible with commercially available consumer electronics equipment. Need: These rules are required to ensure that cable systems do not scramble the basic tier of programming service and permit the operation of commercially available remote control customer premises equipment. Legal Basis: 47 U.S.C. 549. Section Number and Title: 76.630 Compatibility with consumer electronics equipment. SUBPART N-CABLE RATE REGULATION Brief Description: These rules define the obligations of cable operators subject to rate regulation, in particular the limits imposed on cable operators' ability to charge subscribers for changes in subscriber services. Need: The statute requires adoption of rate regulations and imposes limits on charges that cable operators can impose on subscribers.
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-618A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-618A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-618A1.txt
  • effectiveness of the integration ban. Guam is an island that is thousands of miles from the continental United States, and does not have major electronics retailers. Therefore, we do not believe that the benefit of the integration ban in Guam will outweigh even the new limited costs of the integration ban. See Cablevision Systems Corporation's Request for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's Rules, 25 FCC Rcd 134, 140 (MB 2010) (citing 47 U.S.C. �� 154(i), 544(a)). (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 11-618 Federal Communications Commission DA 11-618 � � � � �
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-79A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-79A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-79A1.txt
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit b Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of San Juan Cable LLC d/b/a OneLink Communications Petition for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) Basic Tier Scrambling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR-8369-Z Adopted: January 13, 2011 Released: January 14, 2011 By the Chief, Media Bureau: introduction San Juan Cable LLC d/b/a OneLink Communications (``OneLink''), operator of a cable system serving the greater San Juan metropolitan area of Puerto Rico, filed the above-captioned petition for special relief requesting waiver of Section 76.630(a)
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254432A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-254432A1.txt
  • tiers. A la carte regulation, in the context of the basic service tier, may raise several substantial questions about the manner in which cable systems would compensate copyright owners for the use of their copyrighted works. See Sports Leagues Comments at 1 1. 5' Id. The Commission generally prohibits cable operators from scrambling the basic service tier. 47 C.F.R. 3 76.630(a). This requirement ensures that all subscribers are able to receive basic service tier channels in the clear and that basic-only subscribers with cable-ready television sets will not need set-top boxes. 50 THE REPORT 17 < > Digital Basic Service Tiers. It has been the Commission's view that the Act contemplates a single basic service tier.52 When analyzing the basic service
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-22A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-22A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-22A1.txt
  • conversion from VSB to QAM causes no degradation of broadcast digital video quality; rather the same quality signal the station delivers to the headend will be received by cable subscribers with digital television receivers. MediaOne Comments at 12. See also Mitsubishi Reply Comments at 10-11 (stating that the remodulation from VSB to QAM should be allowed). For purposes of Section 76.630 of our rules, we clarify that we do not consider the utilization of QAM modulation by a cable operator in the provision of digital cable television service to involve scrambling, encryption or similar technologies of the type referenced therein. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.630. This may be applicable to cable systems that will not be providing any digital cable programming
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-314A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-314A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-314A1.txt
  • open video systems are subject to the EEO public file rules, we modify Section 76.1510 of our rules by referencing Sections 76.1702 and 76.1802 as rule requirements within Part 76, which shall apply to open video systems. Cable operators are prohibited from scrambling or encrypting signals carried on the basic tier; however, waivers of this prohibition may be requested. Section 76.630(a) provides that cable operators are required to inform subscribers by mail of any such waiver request within 30 days from the date the request is filed with the Commission. The operator is required to include a brief summary of the request, and indicate to their subscribers that a copy of the request for waiver is on file for public inspection
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-225A1.txt
  • interfaces, and would only be able to access digital basic tier services. In reply, NCTA argues that the issue of basic tier encryption is already addressed in the Commission's rules and allows for waivers where needed. In addition, NCTA and Comcast assert that a ``basic tier ready'' designation would be confusing as to the level of service offered. While Section 76.630 generally prohibits encryption of the basic tier, the express issue of digital basic tier encryption is outside the scope of this proceeding and appropriate notice has not been given. As a result, we decline to act on EFF's request. B. PODs Section 76.1204 of the Commission's rules requires cable operators to provide PODs to subscribers at their request for use
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.txt
  • further the digital transition and ensure the continued flow of high value content to broadcast outlets, further comment is needed on several issues. As an initial matter, we seek comment on whether cable operators that retransmit DTV broadcasts may encrypt the digital basic tier in order to convey the presence of the ATSC flag through their conditional access system. Section 76.630 of the Commission's rules generally prohibits cable operators from ``scrambl[ing] or encrypt[ing] signals carried on the basic service tier'' without distinguishing between analog and digital service. NCTA has suggested that allowing cable operators to encrypt the digital basic tier and ``virtually'' convey the presence of the flag will facilitate the offering of future home networking services. We seek comment on
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-329A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-329A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-329A1.txt
  • of 1996: Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices and Compatibility Between Cable Systems and Consumer Electronics Equipment, CS Docket No. 97-80 and PP Docket NO. 00-67, FCC No. 03-225 (rel. Oct. 9, 2003) (``Digital Cable Compatibility Order and FNPRM''). See 5 U.S.C. � 604. See Digital Cable Compatibility Order and FNPRM at Appendix B (concerning � 76.1904(a)); see also 47 C.F.R. 76.630. 5 U.S.C. � 603(b)(3). 5 U.S.C. � 601(6). 5 U.S.C. � 601(3) (incorporating by reference the definition of ``small business concern'' in the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. � 632). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. � 601(3), the statutory definition of a small business applies ``unless an agency, after consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and
• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-11-153A1.txt
  • receive cable programming. Section 624A of the Act was added by Section 17 of the 1992 Cable Act to address this issue. Specifically, Section 624A requires the Commission to issue regulations to assure compatibility between consumer electronics equipment and cable systems. In 1994, the Commission implemented the requirements of Section 624A. As part of that implementation, the Commission added Section 76.630(a) to its rules. Section 76.630(a) prohibits cable operators from scrambling or encrypting signals carried on the basic tier of service. The Commission determined that this rule would significantly advance compatibility by ensuring that all subscribers would be able to receive basic tier signals ``in the clear'' and that basic-only subscribers with cable-ready televisions would not need set-top boxes. The Commission
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.txt
  • conversion from VSB to QAM causes no degradation of broadcast digital video quality; rather the same quality signal the station delivers to the headend will be received by cable subscribers with digital television receivers. MediaOne Comments at 12. See also Mitsubishi Reply Comments at 10-11 (stating that the remodulation from VSB to QAM should be allowed). For purposes of Section 76.630 of our rules, we clarify that we do not consider the utilization of QAM modulation by a cable operator in the provision of digital cable television service to involve scrambling, encryption or similar technologies of the type referenced therein. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.630. This may be applicable to cable systems that will not be providing any digital cable programming
• http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.txt
  • consumers the capability of television receivers to operate with cable television systems. In �18, infra, we seek comment on a possible ``alternative designation for a digital television receiver.'' Id. See Equipment Compatibility First Report and Order, at 1981-82. Each television broadcaster is assigned 6 Mhz of capacity which corresponds to a specific channel on a television set. See 47 C.F.R. �76.630(c). See 47 C.F.R. ��15.117(h), 15.118. See Letter from Robert Sachs, President and CEO, NCTA and Gary Shapiro, President and CEO, CEA to William Kennard, Chairman FCC (Feb. 22, 2000), Appendix 1 Technical Agreement Between CEA and NCTA. Id., Appendix 2 Carriage of PSIP over Cable Plants. The agreement makes no mention of requirements on television receiving equipment. We assume that
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2488A1.html
  • 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband ("Bend Broadband" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2489A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bright House Networks, LLC ("Bright House" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2490A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cablevision Systems Corp. ("Cablevision" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2491A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Comcast Corporation ("Comcast" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2492A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cox Communications ("Cox" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2493A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to GCI, Inc. ("GCI" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2494A1.html
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Harron Entertainment Company ("Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2495A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ("Midcontinent" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2496A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to RCN Corporation ("RCN" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2497A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ("Suddenlink" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2498A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2499A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Verizon Communications ("Verizon" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://transition.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2500A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99012.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99012.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/1999/fcc99012.wp
  • reasonable opportunity to prepare a response and to present it in a timely fashion. MISCELLANEOUS NOTICES 76.1614 Additional miscellaneous notifications. In addition to the notifications required by the "MISCELLANEOUS NOTICES" section of this subpart, cable operators must provide all notifications which are required by section 76.802 (removal of cable home wiring), section 76.804 (removal of home run wiring), and section 76.630(a) (request for waiver to scramble basic signals). �76.1615 Identification of must-carry signals. A cable operator shall respond in writing within 30 days to any written request by any person for the identification of the signals carried on its system in fulfillment of the must-carry requirements of section 76.56. �76.1616 Sponsorship identification. (a) When a cable television system operator engaged in
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001867.doc
  • Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of: Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico, Inc. Petition for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) Basic Tier Scrambling ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CSR 5497-Z Adopted: August 11, 2000 Released: August 15, 2000 By the Chief, Cable Services Bureau: INTRODUCTION In the above-captioned proceeding, Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico, Inc. (``Liberty''), filed a petition for special relief requesting waiver of Section 76.630(a) of the Commission's rules. Section 76.630(a) provides that "[c]able systems shall
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2001/fcc01022.txt
  • conversion from VSB to QAM causes no degradation of broadcast digital video quality; rather the same quality signal the station delivers to the headend will be received by cable subscribers with digital television receivers. MediaOne Comments at 12. See also Mitsubishi Reply Comments at 10-11 (stating that the remodulation from VSB to QAM should be allowed). For purposes of Section 76.630 of our rules, we clarify that we do not consider the utilization of QAM modulation by a cable operator in the provision of digital cable television service to involve scrambling, encryption or similar technologies of the type referenced therein. See 47 C.F.R. � 76.630. This may be applicable to cable systems that will not be providing any digital cable programming
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Notices/fcc00137.txt
  • consumers the capability of television receivers to operate with cable television systems. In �18, infra, we seek comment on a possible ``alternative designation for a digital television receiver.'' Id. See Equipment Compatibility First Report and Order, at 1981-82. Each television broadcaster is assigned 6 Mhz of capacity which corresponds to a specific channel on a television set. See 47 C.F.R. �76.630(c). See 47 C.F.R. ��15.117(h), 15.118. See Letter from Robert Sachs, President and CEO, NCTA and Gary Shapiro, President and CEO, CEA to William Kennard, Chairman FCC (Feb. 22, 2000), Appendix 1 Technical Agreement Between CEA and NCTA. Id., Appendix 2 Carriage of PSIP over Cable Plants. The agreement makes no mention of requirements on television receiving equipment. We assume that
• http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Orders/2000/fcc00342.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Orders/2000/fcc00342.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/OPP/Orders/2000/fcc00342.txt
  • of one or more operator-supplied set-top boxes. In a modular security environment, two or more PODs and complementary POD interfaces on the host devices will be necessary to effect these functions, because PODs are capable of passing only one channel at a time for display. This situation is parallel to what exists now in the analog domain, and 47 C.F.R. �76.630(c) reflects this situation. We see no need to impose different requirements for digital television at this time. Hence we will not modify our supplementary equipment rules. A few commenters provide opinions on the two compatibility issues that are the subject of the February 22, 2000 agreement between CEA and NCTA, issues on which comment was not sought in the Notice.
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2000/dd000815.html
  • AND UNDERSERVE AREAS, INCLUDING TRIBAL AND INSULAR AREAS. Granted the request for extension of time to supplement the record filed by Western Wireless. Dkt No.: CC- 96-45. Action by Deputy Chief, Common Carrier Bureau. Adopted: August 15, 2000. by Order. (DA No. 00-1851). CCB Internet URL: [16]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da001851.doc LIBERTY CABLEVISION OF PUERTO RICO. Granted Liberty's petition for special relief from Section 76.630(a). Action by Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Adopted: August 11, 2000. by MO&O. (DA No. 00-1867). CSB Internet URL: [17]http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Cable/Orders/2000/da001867.doc COMCAST CABLEVISION OF MERCER COUNTY, INC. Denied petition for reconsideration filed by Maranatha Broadcasting Company, Inc., licensee of WFMZ-TV, Allentown, PA, regarding the denial of its complaint against Comcast Cablevision involving channel positioning. Action by Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Adopted:
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2001/dd011025.html
  • CSB [17]DA-01-2473A1.doc [18]DA-01-2473A1.pdf [19]DA-01-2473A1.txt DON HENRY V. AT&T CABLE SERVICES. Denied petition for relief filed pursuant to Section 76.975 of the Rules by Don Henry in File No. CSR 5504-L. Action by: Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Adopted: 10/19/2001 by MO&O. (DA No. 01-2474). CSB [20]DA-01-2474A1.doc [21]DA-01-2474A1.pdf [22]DA-01-2474A1.txt WAITSFIELD CABLE COMPANY. Granted petition filed by Waitsfield seeking waiver of Section 76.630(a), allowing the cable operator to scramble its basic service tier. Action by: Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Adopted: 10/23/2001 by MO&O. (DA No. 01-2475). CSB [23]DA-01-2475A1.doc [24]DA-01-2475A1.pdf [25]DA-01-2475A1.txt COMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL, INC. (CCI). Dismissed CCI's lastest application for review. Action by: the Commission. Adopted: 10/19/2001 by MO&O. (FCC No. 01-312). WTB [26]FCC-01-312A1.doc [27]FCC-01-312A1.pdf [28]FCC-01-312A1.txt TROMPEX CORPORATION (TROMPEX). Set forth the disqualification
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2001/dd011130.html
  • CORPORATION. Granted requests for waiver of the definition of "study area"; waiver of the "all-or-nothing" rule;and permitted Saddleback Communications to participate in the NECA common line tariff effective upon closing of the transaction. Action by: Deputy Chief, Accounting Policy Division. Adopted: 11/29/2001 by ORDER. (DA No. 01-2777). CCB [58]DA-01-2777A1.doc [59]DA-01-2777A1.pdf [60]DA-01-2777A1.txt CARIBBEAN COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION. Denied Petition for Waiver of Section 76.630(a) Basic Tier Scrambling. Action by: Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Adopted: 11/21/2001 by MO&O. (DA No. 01-2755). CSB [61]DA-01-2755A1.doc [62]DA-01-2755A1.pdf [63]DA-01-2755A1.txt LARRY L. SCHRECONGOST, LICENSEE OF LOW POWER TELEVISION STATION W49BV, INDIANA, PENNSYLVANIA V. TCI OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., ET AL.. Denied Request for Carriage. Action by: Deputy Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Adopted: 11/20/2001 by ORDER. (DA No. 01-2758). CSB [64]DA-01-2758A1.doc [65]DA-01-2758A1.pdf
• http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Digest/2003/dd030424.html
  • Bureau. Adopted: 04/21/2003 by MO&O. (DA No. 03-1201). MB [127]DA-03-1201A1.doc [128]DA-03-1201A1.pdf [129]DA-03-1201A1.txt MEDIACOM SOUTHEAST LLC. Granted the effective competition petition filed by Mediacom for Santa Rosa County, FL. Action by: Deputy Chief, Policy Division, Media Bureau. Adopted: 04/21/2003 by MO&O. (DA No. 03-1192). MB [130]DA-03-1192A1.doc [131]DA-03-1192A1.pdf [132]DA-03-1192A1.txt CENTENNIAL PUERTO RICO CABLE TV CORPORATION. Granted Centennial's Petition for Waiver of Section 76.630 of the Commission's rules to allow Centennial to scramble the basic service tier in various communities. Action by: Deputy Chief, Media Bureau. Adopted: 04/17/2003 by MO&O. (DA No. 03-1200). MB [133]DA-03-1200A1.doc [134]DA-03-1200A1.pdf [135]DA-03-1200A1.txt CALUMET OIL COMPANY. Denied the Petition for Reconsideration. Action by: Chief, Public Safety and Private Wireless Division, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau. Adopted: 04/22/2003 by MO&O. (DA No. 03-1179).
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2488A1.html
  • 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bend Cable Communications, Inc. d/b/a Bend Broadband ("Bend Broadband" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2489A1.html
  • Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Bright House Networks, LLC ("Bright House" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2490A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cablevision Systems Corp. ("Cablevision" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2491A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Comcast Corporation ("Comcast" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2492A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Cox Communications ("Cox" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2493A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to GCI, Inc. ("GCI" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2494A1.html
  • 13, 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Harron Entertainment Company ("Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2495A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Midcontinent Communications, Inc. ("Midcontinent" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2496A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to RCN Corporation ("RCN" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2497A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Suddenlink Communications, Inc. ("Suddenlink" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2498A1.html
  • the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Time Warner Cable, Inc. ("TWC" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2499A1.html
  • 2008 By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Verizon Communications ("Verizon" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/eb/Orders/2008/DA-08-2500A1.html
  • By the Chief, Enforcement Bureau: 1. On October 30, 2008, the Enforcement Bureau ("Bureau") sent a Letter of Inquiry ("LOI") to Charter Communications, Inc. ("Charter" or "Company") seeking information concerning potential violations of various requirements of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended ("Act") and the Commission's rules ("Rules"), including, but not limited to, 47 U.S.C. S:543 and 47 C.F.R. S:S:76.630, 76.980, and 76.1603. The LOI sought information from Company concerning whether Company may have moved certain analog basic or expanded basic channels to a digital tier (herein referred to as an "analog-to-digital channel change"), making such channels unavailable to analog subscribers unless they obtained a Company-supplied digital set top box and/or subscribed separately to Company's digital programming tier. 2. Question
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/76print.html
  • basic signal leakage performance criteria. [70]76.612 Cable television frequency separation standards. [71]76.613 Interference from a multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD). [72]76.614 Cable television system regular monitoring. [73]76.616 Operation near certain aeronautical and marine emergency radio frequencies. [74]76.617 Responsibility for interference. [75]76.618 Grandfathering. [76]76.619 Grandfathered operation in the frequency bands 108-136 and 225-400 MHz. [77]76.620 Non-cable multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs). [78]76.630 Compatibility with consumer electronics equipment. Subpart L -- Cable Television Access [79]76.701 Leased access channels. [80]76.702 Public access. Subpart M -- Cable Inside Wiring [81]76.800 Definitions. [82]76.801 Scope. [83]76.802 Disposition of cable home wiring. [84]76.804 Disposition of home run wiring. [85]76.805 Access to molding. [86]76.806 Pre-termination access to cable home wiring. Subpart N -- Cable Rate Regulation [87]76.901 Definitions. [88]76.905
• http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/part76.pdf
  • bands 108�137 and 225�400 MHz-scope of application. � 76.611 Cable television basic signal leakage performance criteria. � 76.612 Cable television frequency separation standards. � 76.613 Interference from a multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD). � 76.614 Cable television system regular monitoring. � 76.616 Operation near certain aeronautical and marine emergency radio frequencies. � 76.617 Responsibility for interference. �� 76.618-76.620 [Reserved] � 76.630 Compatibility with consumer electronics equipment. � 76.640 Support for unidirectional digital cable products on digital cable systems. Subpart L-Cable Television Access � 76.701 Leased access channels. � 76.702 Public access. Subpart M-Cable Inside Wiring � 76.800 Definitions. � 76.801 Scope. � 76.802 Disposition of cable home wiring. � 76.804 Disposition of home run wiring. � 76.805 Access to molding. �